My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03444
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03444
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:27:53 PM
Creation date
8/17/2005 11:57:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3444
Planning Files - Type
Miscellaneous
Project Name
Roselawn Cemetery vs City of Roseville
Applicant
Roselawn Cemetery vs City of Roseville
Status
Non-Active
Additional Information
Roselawn Cemetry vs City of Roseville 010103
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />FW: Roselawn v. Roseville/3200-149 <br /> <br />Page 10f2 <br /> <br />Paschke, Thomas <br /> <br />From: Beets, Neal <br />Sent: Wednesday, January 08,20033:17 PM <br />To: Welsch, Dennis; Paschke, Thomas <br />Cc: Driscoll, Margaret <br />Subject: FW: Roselawn v. Roseville/3200-149 <br /> <br />As the date gets closer, or as George's need for a time commitment for a city representative gets more pressing, let's talk about <br />who the City representative could and should be. Thanks. Neal <br /> <br />PS. My initial take on this is that, since the neighbors will be represented and participating, it would seem that the City's <br />representative is there for more technical back-up. In other words, if the neighbors' group can be satisfied, then I believe that <br />Council approval of conditions agreed to by Roselawn and the neighbors would follow easily. Hence, maybe we sit and listen and <br />add insights or depth or context where it seems helpful, but essentially the negotiation of conditions is between the neighbors and <br />Roselawn. <br /> <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: George Hoff [mailto:ghoff@hbklaw.com] <br />Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:59 AM <br />To: neal.beets@ci.roseville.mn.us <br />Subject: FW: Roselawn v. Roseville/3200-149 <br /> <br />Neal - I used the wrong address. This should go through. <br /> <br />George <br /> <br />--mOriginal Message--m <br />From: George Hoff [l11ailto:ghoff@hbklaV\l.cQrn] On Behalf Of george <br />Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:50 AM <br />To: 'Mark Rossow (E-mail).;.neal.beets@ci-roseville.mn.us. <br />Cc: justin <br />Subject: FW: Roselawn v. Rosevillej3200-149 <br /> <br />Please find with this a copy an email that I sent to the attys. on the case. If we need a mediation (if the attys. cannot resolve the <br />issue), we would likely have the formal mediation during the weeks shown. Neal, I expect that you or some other city <br />representative (Dennis, Thomas) would need to be present. I assume that I could get someone to be present at that time if <br />needed. I do not have a specific date at this time and probably won't have a date until late next week. Mark, given the issues <br />involved, I don't see the need for you to be present at the mediation. <br /> <br />George <br /> <br />-m-Original Message-m- <br />From: George Hoff [mailto:ghoff@hbklaw.com] <br />Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:45 AM <br />To: 'tradio@hinshawlaw.com'; 'tomgoodman@sbgdf.com' <br />Subject: Roselawn v. Rosevillej3200-149 <br /> <br />I received a voice mail from Bruce Malkerson today. He indicated that he would be willing to mediate the dispute at $225 per hour <br />for his time. Based on the description of the parties involved that he did not have a conflict. He also indicated that he is going to <br />be around for the next few weeks. <br /> <br />01/08/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.