My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03448
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03448
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:28:24 PM
Creation date
8/25/2005 9:09:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3448
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
1910 Coun ty Road C
Project Name
Gem Investments/Casci, Mark
Applicant
Abra Auto Body & Glass
Status
Approved
Date Final City Council Action
11/17/2003
Additional Information
PUD/Final Plat/Rezoning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Memo <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke, City Planner <br />John Loftus, Fire MarS'"1ll;jd^' ^ <br />I ~/ J---- <br />, <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />cc: <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br />January 3, 2003 <br />1910 West County Road C <br /> <br />Re: <br /> <br />Again, I apologize for being unable to attend the ORC meeting this week. I hope it does <br />not cause any hardship to the other members of the committee as it has apparently in <br />the past however I was scheduled for the training I am attending prior to the <br />announcement of the meeting. <br /> <br />I do have some comments however regarding the propose redevelopment of this site. <br /> <br />1. As I mentioned previously, I have some concerns regarding the lack of adequate <br />water supplies provided to and within the site. Currently, the entire site is served <br />with a single dead end 8 inch water main which ends at the adjacent property to <br />the West. Although the proposed extension of an 8 inch main to the rear of the <br />property is a great improvement, I am not convinced that this single, dead ended <br />main will provide adequate fire protection to the site. Factoring the use of the <br />proposed buildings and construction type, a minimum flow of 1,500 gallons per <br />minute would be required. This may be possible with the proposed mains but <br />would have to be proven by a fire protection engineer. <br /> <br />2. Fire Hydrant placement. A fire hydrant is required to be placed 50 feet to 60 feet <br />from the fire department connection on the buildings. Additionally, fire hydrants <br />must be provided so that no portion of the exterior walls are more that 150 feet <br />from a hydrant. These requirements would dictate more hydrants than what are <br />currently proposed. <br /> <br />3. I would like to propose that, in the interest of future development, the water <br />mains on this site and also on the adjacent sites be looped at or near the rear <br />portions of these properties. At the very least, it would be advisable to require <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.