Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />IS as <br /> <br />A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use ifused under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls: The Peterson parcel is afforded a <br />location option that meets the 30 foot required setback, but this location would <br />place the building in about the middle of the home and further into the down slope <br />of the parcel and closer to the shoreline. The parcel has no existing garage and <br />the location as proposed has the least impact on the slope. The Community <br />Development staff has reviewed the site conditions to determine whether there is <br />a reasonable alternative/solution that warrants support for the variance requested. <br />Based on Staff review of the existing situation on the Peterson parcel and the <br />existing drainage, grading, and landscape conditions of the parcel, we have <br />concluded that the proposed location, 12 feet from the property line adjacent <br />the private drive portion of South Owasso Boulevard West, 5 feet from the <br />east (side yard) line and 6 feet from the principal structure, is a practical and <br />reasonable solution to the uniqueness of the parcel. In this location the proposed <br />garage also has less impact on the shore land area (The City Code allows private <br />road owners to deternline whether parking is allowed on the private road <br />boulevard). Based on our analysis of the situation the Community Development <br />Staff has determined that the property can be made more livable, minimize <br />additional impervious surface, and can be put to a reasonable use under the <br />official controls, if the two variances are granted. <br /> <br />B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not <br />created by the landowner: Parcels located around Lake Owasso in this area were <br />subdivided in the 1930's and 1940's, prior to the establishment oflot standards <br />and zoning regulations. That being said, most of the structures on these parcels <br />do not meet current Code requirements and are determined to be legal pre- <br />existing non-conforming, which includes the Peterson home. Given the <br />uniqueness of this parcel, and the desire to minimize lake shore impacts, the <br />Community Development Staff has determined that the plight of the <br />landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the <br />landowner (structure placement prior to code, drainage, and topographic <br />issues). <br /> <br />C. The variance, ifgra11.ted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: <br />The improvements proposed (detached accessory building) is consistent past <br />variances granted to other property owners around Lake Owasso, and said <br />location reduces lakeshore impacts and afford convenience to the property owner, <br />without sacrificing the public health, safety and general welfare of the adjacent <br />neighborhood. The Community Development Staff has determined that this <br />variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality, nor <br />adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare, of the city or <br />adjacent properties. <br /> <br />PF3484 - ReA 06/16/03- Page 4 of 5 <br />