Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 Member Traynor noted the Planning Commission needs to see continuous use throughout <br />6 a year - Watkins does park them on the site but mostly in the fall. The previous tenant <br />7 destroyed portions of the temporary staging area. Non-paved area for trailers is best <br />8 because of the damage to pavement in the summer. <br />9 <br />10 Member Duncan explained that an interim use permit is appropriate. <br />11 <br />12 Karl Dordal said Watkins cannot survive without expansion on this site. Watkins may <br />13 have to expand. <br />14 <br />15 Member Bakeman proposed the five-year Interim Use Permit with evidence that Watkins <br />16 uses of the site will be continuous. <br />17 <br />18 Mr. Dordal asked when notice will be given to discontinue (six months after termination <br />19 of the IUP). <br />20 <br />21 Member Stone summarized conditions. If an expansion occurs, will the IUP go with the <br />22 site. Is there any evidence of continuance? <br />23 <br />24 Chair Duncan closed the hearing. <br />25 <br />26 Motion: Member Duncan moved, seconded by Member Traynor, to deny the appeal and <br />27 recommend to the Council an Interim Use Permit for three years to expand to a B-6 <br />28 zoned parcel owned by Western Resources with tenant Watkins Trucking located at 2560 <br />29 Long Lake Road because it is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />30 <br />31 Ayes: 5 <br />32 Nays: 1 (_) <br />33 Motion carried. <br />34 <br />35 Member Traynor said the lack of evidence of continuous use, an IUP works best. <br />36 <br />37 Member Bakeman recommended conditions be placed on the IUP. <br />38 <br />39 This item will be on the City Council Consent Agenda for the June 16,2003 meeting. <br />40 <br />41 <br />