Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5.6 Staff analysis of undue hardship factors is as follows: <br /> <br />A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls: The Meyer parcel is unable to <br />reasonably expand impervious surface coverage to address maneuvering and <br />access constraints without a variance due to the parcel's coverage restrictions. <br />Requiring modifications from the proposal take away from the usefulness of the <br />driveway and would not eliminate current garage access conflicts. The <br />Community Development Staff has determined that the property can be <br />made more livable, useful, and put to a reasonable use under the official <br />controls if the requested variance granted. <br /> <br />B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not <br />created by the landowner: The Meyer property (site/structure) is unique. It was <br />constructed before the Village/City established a zoning code and before the City <br />established lot coverage maximums. Family needs and the inability to safely <br />maneuver vehicles in the driveway have created certain conflicts Roseville's <br />present code. The Community Development Staff has determined that the <br />plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not <br />created by the landowner. <br /> <br />C. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: <br />The improvement proposed for the Meyer parcel will not be out of character or <br />context of a home from 1950's and more importantly in keeping with today's <br />designs and family accommodations. The Community Development Staff has <br />determined that this variance, if granted, will not alter the essential <br />character of the locality, nor adversely affect the public health, safety, or <br />general welfare, of the city or adjacent properties. <br /> <br />6.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br /> <br />6.1 Based on the information provided and the findings in Section 5 ofthis project report, the <br />Community Development Staff recommends approval of an 887 square foot (7%) <br />VARIANCE to Section 1004.01A6 of the Roseville City Code for John Meyer to allow <br />the replacement and expansion of an existing driveway at 2735 Fernwood Street, subject <br />to the following conditions: <br /> <br />A. The proposed improvements must not exceed 4,483 square feet of impervious <br />coverage or 37% of the parcel size. <br /> <br />B. The property owner must locate the lot's property pins (or provide a survey) and <br />based on that, developing a scaled site plan with dimensions for structures and <br />driveway, thus allowing the Community Development Department to verify <br />proper placement of the accessory building and lot coverage. <br /> <br />PF3486 - ReA 061603 - Page 4 of 5 <br />