My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03488
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03488
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:29:23 PM
Creation date
3/13/2006 2:41:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3488
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
Address
2154 LEXINGTON AVE
Applicant
Muna Sabri
Status
Approved
PIN
142923220016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />a rear <br />on or very near the east <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Section 1010.14 of the Roseville City Code requires all connnercial properties to have <br />some landscaping including boulevard trees per the Roseville Street Tree Master Plan <br />and Section 1010.05 requires all on- site parking lots to have a minimrnll landscaping of <br />5%. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Section 1005.09E stipulates: Driveways: No driveway at a property line shall be less <br />than fifty feet (50') from the intersection of two (2) street right-of-way lines, The site <br />currently has four access points, two each from Lexington Avenue and County Road B, <br />which one along each roadway is non-confonnmg. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Section 1005.ID6B stipulates: There shall be no off-street parking within fifteen feet <br />(15') of any street right of way. Currently the parking and travel lane lies at the property <br />line with no separation, <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Section 1005.09C" stipulates: Parking and Service Areas and Curbs: No parking"or <br />service area shan be less than five feet (5') from a property line and a box curb shan <br />separate the public sidewalk from such parking and/or service areas except at approved <br />entrances and exits. Here too the site has been paved up to the property line affording <br />no green area/setback. <br /> <br />6.4 Staff analysis of undue hardship factors is as follows: <br /> <br />A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use (fused under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls: The Community Development Staff <br />has determined that the property can be made more useful, and put to a <br />reasonable use under the official controls if the requested variance granted. <br /> <br />B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not <br />created by the landowner: The Community Development Staff has determined <br />that the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property <br />not created by the current landowner. <br /> <br />C. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: <br />The Community Development Staff has determined that this variance, if <br />granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality, nor adversely <br />affect the public health, safety, or general welfare, of the city or adjacent <br />properties. <br /> <br />PF3488 RPCA 060403 - Page 5 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.