pf_03493 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

5.2 Staff has reviewed the development proposal with regard to the criteria in Section 10l3.0l.D of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance and concludes the proposal meets these criteria. Specifically, a detached accessory building is a permitted use in an R-l District. The proposed detached garage will not create additional traffic nor the need for additional public facilities. With proper exterior building treatment, drainage, and landscaping, the building will not have an impact on surrounding property or values. There appears to be no impact on general health, safety, and public welfare. In addition, the project complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation as low density residential uses. 6.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Based on the information provided and the findings in Section 5 of this project report, the Community Development Staff recommends approval ofa CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT for Ms. Mary Brown to allow the construction of a 949 square foot detached Accessory building (garage) in the rear yard of property at 2185 St. Croix Street, subject to the following conditions: A. The detached accessory building being limited to a size not to exceed 949 square feet. The existing building must be removed from the site. B. Gutters being installed to properly direct storm water into the rear yard (east) and away from 2377 County Road B. C. Windows being installed along the south building wall of the detached accessory building to break up the linear mass as viewed from 377 County Road B. D. The accessory building being setback a minimum of 5 feet from the side and rear property line. E. The parcel being limited to a maximum impervious coverage of 5,759 square feet. F. The review and approval of a building permit being consistent with the approved plans and conditional use permit. G. This conditional use permit shall expire 6 months after approval if a building permit has not been issued (Section 1013.03). 7.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: 7.1 On July 9, 2003, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the Brown conditional use permit request. No citizens were present to address the Commission and the Commission had no specific questions of staff or the applicant except clarification on the required setbacks and the permitted versus conditional use process. PF3493 - ReA 072103 - Page 3 of 4