CC_Minutes_2015_0112 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,January 12, 2015 Page 13 HRA meetings, Councilmember Laliberte noted how brisk they were; and sug- gested the HRA take more time at their meetings to ask the right questions, since the community granted the HRA a good deal of money to operate. While the City owned the property, Councilmember Laliberte noted that one of the repercussions of the delay was that a great deal of time had been lost, with City staff and the community at large having put a lot of time and energy into the planning stages, with the end proposal highly praised. Councilmember Laliberte opined that it was unfortunate that some much time had been lost, and expressed her disappointment that, when it was first determined that financing was problematic, it should have raised more flags than it did. Councilmember Willmus stated that he was not in any way pleased with the time lapse for this project as noted by Councilmember Laliberte, but also remained thankful that the City held the property title, and ramifications were few other than reversing drainage and utility easements. However, Councilmember Willmus reiterated the need for the City Council, HRA and staff to be in a better position to keep track of various projects. In recognizing that this item will come back to the City Council for discussion at their February 9, 2015 meeting, Councilmember Laliberte noted that, while some other proposals initially came before the City Council, it had been determined at that time that they were never going to work, and cautioned that they really didn't need to be reviewed again, since the community meetings had supported that the GMHC proposal was the best option, and there should be no need to start over again with less viable proposals. Mayor Roe shared the disappointment expressed that things were not better tracked during the process, while recognizing that everyone was working toward the end product and were confident that financing would fall into place more quickly than it did, which to some extent was out of the City's control. However, Mayor Roe admitted that he would have been more comfortable if that infor- mation was brought forward before now. Mayor Roe stated that his takeaway from tonight's discussion was that the GMHC proposal was the best concept brought forward, and suggested the directive to City and HRA staff should be to see if other developers were willing to pursue that concept. In recognizing that the former Owasso School property, now vacant, had received proposals for higher-density, owner-occupied homes, Mayor Roe suggested that it may interest the same developers as part of this development to mix single family homes with higher-density units that may make a larger package more attractive to them versus them attempting to propose something completely different than what had already been ruled out based on community input. City Manager Trudgeon advised that staff would pursue a package similar to that proposed by GMHC with the development community. Mr. Trudgeon addressed