CC_Minutes_2015_0112 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,January 12, 2015 Page 12 ward recommending that the City determine if other developers are interested in doing a similar development as that proposed by GMHC. Councilmember Willmus thanked City Manager Trudgeon for his update and ex- planation; and expressed his concern with the overall process and consequences of the predevelopment agreement lapsing. While several actions had come before the City Council during the process, Councilmember Willmus opined the silver lining, if there is one, was that the City retained control over and title to the prop- erty and other parties were not yet involved, which could have resulted in some major issues. Councilmember Willmus stated that something to be learned from this process for the City Council, the HRA and staff was the need to stay on top of these things, whether it had been extension of the predevelopment agreement by the HRA; or going forward what measures or stop gaps could be put in place to call attention to issues periodically through such a process, or flagging certain dates to provide that periodic review. City Manager Trudgeon concurred that, certainly on staff's part, assurances of certain dates and better project management, as well as more frequent updates with the City Council, were called for. As one option, Mr. Trudgeon suggested a report by a representative of the HRA at each City Council meeting to check-in on a process, and/or clear documentation of dates and information and updates avail- able to the public throughout that process, essentially a series of checks and bal- ances. Mr. Trudgeon noted that this project could serve as a learning experience, and expressed his thankfulness that no lasting repercussions resulted from this de- lay; however, he duly noted the points brought up about the failure of the process in this case. At the request of Councilmember Willmus, City Manager Trudgeon, confirmed that the public would also have an opportunity to weigh in at the HRA meeting if they chose to do so. While realizing that the delay was problematic, Councilmember McGehee stated her assumptions that the HRA was following it closely. Councilmember McGe- hee expressed her thankfulness that the City owned the land; and while having participated in the public meetings, opined that it remained a good project with neighborhood support. While also understanding that the financing was holding up the project, Councilmember McGehee referenced her understanding from the residential and commercial community that appraisals were delayed across the board from lending institutions at this time as the economy continued to rebound. Councilmember McGehee expressed her support of the GMHC proposal, and looked forward to the recommendation of the HRA from their upcoming meeting. Councilmember Laliberte expressed her disagreement with her colleagues, opin- ing that the HRA did not follow this project closely enough; and expressed her hope that they paid much closer attention in the future. As a regular viewer of