Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />to at <br />side of the driveway where the driveway intersects the street, three foot (3') flares are <br />permitted. The maximum driveway width for all other uses shall be thirty six feet (36') <br />and ten foot (10') flares are permitted. <br /> <br />5.5 Section 703.04B8 reads: Driveway Elevation: The driveway elevation at the property <br />line shall not be more than ten inches (lO") nor less than four inches (4") above the <br />center line of the abutting street with a maximum slope to gutter lines of 10%+ and a <br />minimum slope of2%+. <br /> <br />5.6 Section 1004.01All reads: In-Ground Garages: Where the natural grade ofa lot at the <br />building line of a house is eight feet or more above the established curb lever, an <br />accessory building for vehicle storage (garage) may be erected within any yard, provided <br />that ~ of the wall height or more is below grade lever. Such an accessory building shall <br />be set back a minimum of 20 feet from any right-of-way. The Code is not clear on <br />whether a living area can be constructed on top of the garage at this setback. <br /> <br />6.0 STAFF COMMENTS/FINDINGS: <br /> <br />6.1 The proposed improvements to the Meade home meet the goals and objectives of the <br />Housing Plan. Specifically, the Housing Plan encourages reinvestment into existing <br />housing to provide increased functionality to retain families within the community to <br />maintain a quality neighborhood. <br /> <br />6.2 Section 1013.02 states: Where there are practical difficulties or unusual hardships in the <br />way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this code, the city council shall <br />have the power, in a specific case and after notice and public hearings, to vary any such <br />provision in harmony with the general purpose and intent thereof and may impose such <br />additional conditions as it considers necessary so that the public health, safety, and <br />general welfare may be secured and substantial justice done. <br /> <br />6.3 State Statute 462.357, subd. 6 (2) provides authority for the city to "hear requests for <br />variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their strict <br />enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the <br />individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is <br />demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance <br />means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use ifused under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances <br />unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not <br />alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not <br />constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of <br />the ordinance....The board or governing body as the case may be may impose conditions <br />in the granting of variances to insure compliance and to protect" <br /> <br />PF3430 - ReA 102102 Page 3 of 5 <br />