Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />As <br />within <br />where <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />moratorium <br /> <br /> <br />Leave it be, <br /> <br /> <br />to be <br /> <br /> <br />without at least in <br />that are resulting from <br /> <br /> <br />that allows: <br />Road C reconstruction or access <br /> <br /> <br />RE: Stakeholders panel/Master Developer arrangement: <br /> <br />I am concerned about the prospect of the City defining a certain developer (or developers) and granting a <br />status that requires we as property owners are required to involve with any certain party if we choose to <br />develop our properties at some point in the future. I'd like some written correspondence from the City that <br />defines what in fact this program means to us knowing that the program is driven primarily by Rosevifle <br />Properties' Cleveland and C plans. This isn't to suggest that those seemingly selected are in any way <br />incapable, <br /> <br />Also, I feel strongly that a plan including Twin Lakes Parkway without the "disconnect" in the roadway is in <br />the best long term interest for traffic flow through the area. As I recall, under this plan, traffic North on <br />Fairview is less than it would be with the disconnect plan. In all historic planning discussions that has <br />always been a significant issue. Obviously, Councilor Ihlan will maintain this as an issue here. <br /> <br />Sean O. Regan <br />Partner <br /> <br />Reco Real Estate, LLC <br />1743A-1755, LLC <br />1875 W. Highway 36 <br />Roseville, MN <br /> <br />651-633-8880 <br />651-633-4449 fax <br />