My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03556
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3500
>
pf_03556
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:33:54 PM
Creation date
3/16/2006 1:55:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3556
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
3103 ASBURY AVE
Applicant
Vernon Albertson
Status
Approved
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />2.8 Should the request be approved by the City Council, the staff, prior to the applicant's <br />recording with the Ramsey County Recorder, must review a certificate of survey and a <br />quit claim deed for compliance with the Council's approval. <br /> <br />3.0 ST AFF FINDINGS & CONDITIONS: <br /> <br />3.1 In review of the Roseville City Code. the City Planner has concluded that the adjustment <br />in property line from its existing location to the proposed location falls under a <br />"RECOMBINATION" under Section 1104.04B and not a "THREE PARCEL MINOR <br />SUBDIVISION" as noticed to the public. <br /> <br />3.2 In February of2004 Mr. Albertson applied for a VARIANCE and MINOR <br />SUBDIVISION, seeking approval to create a substandard parcel width. On April 7, 2004 <br />the Planning Commission held the public hearing requiring the request and unanimously <br />recommended denial, which action lead to the subsequent withdrawal of the request by <br />Mr. Albertson. During the Planning Commission's hearing, staff indicated to the <br />residents that should Mr. Albertson desire to divide the parcel in a manner that meets the <br />City Code, the process would be forwarded to the Council and the neighborhood would <br />be notified of the legal lot line adjustment. <br /> <br />3.3 The City Planner has concluded that the proposal meets the requirements of the <br />Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. <br /> <br />3.4 The City Planner has concluded that the request meets the requirements of Section <br />1004.016 (Residential Dimensional Requirements), Section 1103.06Al and Section <br />11.0406F of the Roseville City Code. Specifically, both parcels have a minimum width <br />of 85 feet, a depth of 110 feet and a minimum of 11,000 sq. ft. Parcel "B" although <br />uniquely designed) has a minimum width of 85 feet at the established 30 foot front yard <br />setback. Parcel "B" has lot lines at substantial right angles to the street line. <br /> <br />3.5 The City policy is to accept park land or cash in lieu of land dedication for the creation of <br />new lots. However, Mr. Albertson is not creating a new lot, but rather adjusting the <br />existing line. No park land dedication is required for this change in lot design. <br /> <br />3.6 The City policy is to accept a Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) upon the issuance of a <br />building permit. In this case, a SAC fee is required and will be collected upon the <br />issuance of a building pern1it for Parcel B. <br /> <br />PF3556_RCA_051004 Page 2 of3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.