Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />a <br />an area street <br />of way to serve the proposed parcels already in accordance with City codes, and no <br />further utility or street extensions are necessary, and the new parcels meet or exceed the <br />size requirements of the zoning code, the applicant may apply for a minor subdivision <br />approval. In this case neither parcel meets all requirements of the City Code. A series of <br />VARIANCES are necessary before a decision on the Minor Subdivision can be made. <br /> <br />5.5 Section 1004.016 (Residential Dimensional Requirements) establishes the minimum lot <br />standards for residential parcels, which includes: an 85 foot minimum width along a <br />public right-of-way; a 110 foot minimum depth; and 11,000 minimum square feet. <br /> <br />5.6 In Section 1013 the Code states ..... '''here there are practical difficulties or unusual <br />hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this code, <br />the Variance Board shall have the power, in a specific case and after notice and <br />public hearings, to vary any such provision in harmony with the general purpose <br />and intent thereof and may impose such additional conditions as it considers <br />necessary so that the public health, safety, and general welfare may be secured and <br />substantial justice done. <br /> <br />5.7 State Statute 462.357, subd. 6 (2) provides authority for the city to "hear requests <br />for variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their <br />strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to <br />the individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when <br />it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of <br />the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a <br />variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used <br />under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due <br />to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the <br />variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic <br />considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the <br />property exists under the terms of the ordinance....The board or governing body as <br />the case may be may impose conditions in the granting of variances to insure <br />compliance and to protect" <br /> <br />5.8 The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use ifused under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls: The City Code prescribe that all single family residential <br />parcels be a minimum of 110 feet in depth and 11,000 sq. ft. in size. Mr. Trudeau has an <br />existing lot that is 193 feet deep on the north and 200 feet deep on the south. Mr. <br />Trudeau proposes to create two similarly sized and shaped parcels, although each is <br />unable to meet the depth and lot requirements. The lots across Pascal Street are 80 feet <br />wide by 131 and 10,480 sq. ft. in size and the lots across Simpson Street are creative <br />shapes averaging over 100 feet of width, 150 feet of depth and over 12,000 sq. ft. in size. <br />However, there are six parcels in the general vicinity that are of similar design and with <br /> <br />PF3571 ReA 061404 Page 3 of5 <br />