My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03578
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3500
>
pf_03578
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:35:15 PM
Creation date
4/3/2006 10:58:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3578
Planning Files - Type
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Project Name
Guptil development
Applicant
City of Roseville
Status
Approved
Date Final City Council Action
8/9/2004
Date Final Planning Commission Action
7/7/2004
Additional Information
McCarrons neighborhood master plan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />IS <br /> <br />be a tool used, where <br />approval procedures. <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />2.3 The Master Plan projects new housing units to be developed and/or renovated in all <br />phases. In addition, the Plan includes the opportunity to provide new and or renovated <br />neighborhood retail, new housing and/or office space in the areas along Rice Street. <br />Development areas are based upon anticipated short and long range development <br />timeframes. Currently there are 101 apartment units, 38,545 sq.ft. of retail space and <br />44,676 sq.ft. office space in the study area within three development areas. This plan <br />could add 30 to 50 housing units in the first phase of development. <br /> <br />2.4 The redevelopment of the site at 185 North McCarrons Blvd (Guptil property) as high <br />density residential along with more efficient and effective use of the Armory and Church <br />sites through increased partnerships are considered to be the highest priority to be <br />implemented in the next 2-5 years as Phase I. As an alternative to high density housing, <br />it is possible that the Armory and/or the Church could propose a use on the Guptil site <br />that would include related church, church housing, a specialized school, or other service <br />needs. Staff has investigated several options for site development as part of Phase 1. <br /> <br />2.4.1 South side of site: 36 -45 units of senior apartments, cooperatives or condo or 12 <br />three story townhomes. Staff is recommending and the Neighborhood Task Force <br />concurs that the Guptil property not be developed for a few large single family <br />detached housing units. This would not be the most effective use of the site. The <br />higher density option provides more return for the property owner and could serve <br />to provide an alternate housing option for seniors currently living in nearby single <br />family homes which could become available for new families. <br /> <br />2.4.2 North side of site: A maximum of 6 two level, for sale townhomes or 4 small lot <br />single family homes. Each option provides new ownership opportunities for <br />empty nesters, young professional and young families. <br /> <br />2.5 The Phase II proposal, peripheral to the Guptil site, is a 2-10 year plan and includes the <br />improvement of the nearby multi family complexes, ongoing single family residential <br />improvements, and the more complete redevelopment of the Armory site. <br /> <br />2.6 The Phase III proposal, the Rice Street commercial area is a 10 to 20 year plan. <br />Because the project is market-based with development by the private sector, the phases <br />need flexibility within the specified time frames. The Plan may be modified to be more <br />marketable and financially feasible while taking into consideration the planning <br />principles and goals of the Plan, the surrounding neighborhood needs, the livable and <br />natural environment and the community as a whole. <br /> <br />PF3578_RCA_072604 Page 2 of3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.