Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />has What it <br />water gardens be used? Could it be reshaped? Water terraces may be possible <br />from one pond to other. Could armory pond be expanded, to reduce need for <br />Guptil pond? <br />He recommended involving the neighborhood design and uses (rental or <br />and suggested 55+ senior housing is likely proposaL <br /> <br /> <br />1& The Guptil site could be a catalyst for redevelopment entire neighborhood, including <br />the armory site. <br /> <br />1& Regarding design; make edges look like single family, make it look residential rather <br />than St. Paul; do not dominate the site, build into the quality and context of the <br />neighborhood; look at other lots or sites that could also be developed/redeveloped such as <br />those on Elmer. New housing could be an asset to church, armory and surrounding <br />neighbors <br /> <br />Meeting 4. <br /> <br />A final task force meeting was held on March 30, 2004 to review the draft plan. The following <br />members were present and had these comments: <br /> <br />Attendees: Pastor Richard Carlson, Donna Dean, Dennis Guptil, George Johnson, Dan Jeans, <br />Duane Haukebo, Al Garlough, John Palmer, Jerome Wagner, Barbara Wagner, Tony Fautsel <br />City of RoseviUe: Cathy Bennett, Dennis Welsch <br /> <br />Meeting Notes <br /> <br />Dennis and Cathy welcomed everyone and asked for introductions. (Thanks to Galilee for <br />hosting the meeting.) <br /> <br />Cathy provided a summary of the draft master plan and suggested future land use scenarios. <br />Cathy indicated that the plan was a draft and the reason for the meeting was to gain feedback <br />from the neighborhood task force. <br /> <br />Participant Comments regarding the draft plan and suggested future land uses and <br />proposed phasing for implementation <br /> <br />Guptil Site Development - Phase I <br /> <br />1& Encourages senior housing, not apartments - there are already many apartments and are <br />concerned regarding a large impact on the school district <br />1& The school district should have an opportunity to comment on the future land uses and <br />the master plan. <br /> <br />Final Version <br /> <br />26 <br /> <br />July 26, 2004 <br />