Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />Mark Doneux <br />CR WD Coordinator <br />1295 Bandana Blvd. Suite 108 <br />St. Paul, MN 55108 <br /> <br />RE: Guptil Site, 185 McCarrons Blvd, Roseville, MN <br />CRWD Development Review #04-RS-00l <br /> <br />Dear Mark: <br /> <br />Per your request, our office has reassessed the feasibility of developing the above referenced <br />property, in Roseville, MN. <br /> <br />OVERVIEW <br /> <br />The primary parcel to be redeveloped is a 2.65-acre parcel located at 185 McCarrons Blvd and <br />owned by Mr. Dennis Guptil. Currently, an unoccupied house and a garage exist on the south <br />portion of Mr. Guptil's property. A wetland occupying approximately 35% ofthe property is <br />located near the middle of the parcel. The elevated house creates a drainage divide between <br />runoff flowing north into the wetland and southeast into McCarrons Blvd. Runoff from the north <br />portion of the parcel flows south into the wetland. <br /> <br />Other parcels considered for development included a vacant 0.56-acre parcel and a 0.51-acre <br />vacated right-of-way north of Elmer S1. and across from Mr. Guptil's property. The north <br />portion of these parcels is occupied by a waterbody that mayor may not be a wetland. For the <br />purposes of this assessment, we have assumed that it is not a wetland. In general, approximately <br />half of the runoff from these parcels flows north into the waterbody, and half of the runoff is <br />directed to the east. <br /> <br />DEVELOPABLE AREA AND MAXIMUM UNIT CALCULATION <br /> <br />According to the City of Roseville's Comprehensive Plan, the Guptil site has been designated for <br />high-density housing. It was assumed that the Guptil parcel will be rezoned from R-l, Single <br />Family Residence, to R-3A, Multi-Family Residence. Using this information and information <br />from the City of RosevilIe's City Code, the possibilities for development of the site were <br />evaluated. <br /> <br />One of the limitations for the development is that a 50-foot setback must be maintained around a <br />wetland. A wetland delineation has not been completed for the development. Therefore, <br />assumptions for the wetland limits were made for both the Guptil parcel and the Elmer Street <br />parcels. Assuming that a variance will be sought to decrease the wetland buffer setback, the area <br />within a 25-foot radius ofthe 896-foot contour for the Guptil site wetland was designated as <br />undevelopable. For the Elmer Street parcels, the area within a 1 a-foot radius around the 904- <br />foot contour was marked as undevelopable. <br />