My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03638
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3600
>
pf_03638
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:40:35 PM
Creation date
6/14/2006 8:55:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3638
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
Address
2824 LAKEVIEW AVE
Applicant
Russell Cattelan
Status
Approved
PIN
022923310037
Date Final City Council Action
5/23/2005
Planning Files - Resolution #
10303
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />5.9 The Pli2ht ofthe landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and not <br />created by the landowner: The property addressed at 2824 Lakeview Avenue is <br />unique. The property was approved by the Village of Roseville in 1970 as the Mogren's <br />Subdivision, which approval created 2 land locked parcels, accessed via a shared private <br />easement. The property has a steep slope to the east and virtually no ability to relocate a <br />detached accessory structure in the side yard. Under the circumstances, the current <br />location of the detached accessory building is the most reasonable and practical for the <br />parceL The City Planner has determined that the plight ofthe landowner is due to <br />circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. <br /> <br />5.10 The variance, if 2ranted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: Though <br />the proposed accessory building is larger than the existing structure and it requires a <br />Conditional Use Permit, the structure and its use has similarities to other lots and will <br />have minimum additional impact on the adjacent residential properties or the <br />neighborhood. The Staff has determined that the proposed VARIANCES to Sections <br />1004 ofthe Roseville City Code will not alter the essential character of the locality, <br />nor adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare, ofthe city or <br />adjacent properties. <br /> <br />6.0 REVIEW of CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: <br /> <br />6.1 Section 1013.01 requires the City to consider the following criteria when reviewing a <br />Conditional Use Permit: <br /> <br />a. Impact on traffic <br />b. Impacts on parks, streets and other public facilities <br />c. Compatibility ofthe site plan, internal circulation, landscaping and structure with <br />contiguous properties <br />d. Impact use on market <br />e. Impact on the general public health, safety and welfare <br />f. Compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan <br /> <br /> <br />6.2 Permitted Uses. The City Planner has reviewed the proposed improvement, a detached <br />accessory structure (garage) replacement and expansion from 504 sq. ft. to 1007 sq. ft. <br />This use is permitted in an R-I District by issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. <br /> <br />PF3638_RPCA_050405.doc- Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.