Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />4 732 <br />5 in Section 5 and the conditions of Section 6 a <br />6 "a" and <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 a. The elimination of one or both existing sheds from the premises if necessary to meet <br />10 prior to applicant receiving a Occupancy. <br />11 b. No other garden shed or detached accessory structure shall be allowed on the <br />12 premIses. <br />13 c. The attached garage shall be set back a minimum of 12 feet from the front yard <br />14 property line adjacent to Grotto Street. <br />15 d. The attached garage shall be limited to 780 sq. ft. <br />16 e. Parking in front of the attached garage shall be prohibited. Should the applicant <br />17 desire to park in front of the attached garage the structure must be shifted cast g feet <br />18 or the applicant must receive a V,^,RIANCE to Section 601.06 of the Roseville City <br />19 Code from the City Council? <br />20 f. The principal structure (home) including the proposed addition and all paved surfaces <br />21 shall not exceed shall be limited to 3,389 sq. ft. or 33.4%. <br />22 g. Drainage and roof gutters shall be installed to properly direct runoff away from the <br />23 adjoining property. <br />24 h. The variance shall expire within six months after the approval date (May 4, 2005) <br />25 unless that applicant has been granted a building permit. <br />26 <br />27 Ayes: 3 <br />28 Nays: 0 <br />29 Motion carried. <br />30 <br />31 c. Planning: File 3639: Request by Daniel Smith (Dairy Queen), 3070 Lexington <br />32 Avenue, for a Variance to Section 1009 of the Roseville City Code to relocate a <br />33 pylon sign to within one foot of the property line adjacent to Lexington Avenue. <br />34 <br />35 Chair Bakeman opened the hearing and requested staff to provide a verbal summary of the report <br />36 dated May 4,2005. <br />37 <br />38 Thomas Paschke explained that Daniel Smith of SDDQ (Dairy Queen) seeks approval of a 29 <br />39 foot Variance to Section 1005.01 to allow the relocation of an existing pylon sign to within one <br />40 foot of the property line adjacent to Lexington Avenue. The applicant proposes to locate the sign <br />41 one foot from the west property line, similar to those sign variances approved at the B-Dale Club, <br />42 Brentwood Town Offices, and Kinderberry Hill Child Care. <br />43 <br />44 The Staff recommended approval of a 29 foot variance to Section 1005.01 (Business District <br />45 Minimal Dimensional Requirements) ofthe Roseville City Code to allow the relocation of a legal <br />46 conforming pylon sign to no closer than one foot from the propeliy line adjacent to Lexington <br />47 Avenue (west) based on the findings in Section 5 of the project repOlt dated May 4,2005, and the <br />48 following conditions: <br />49 <br />50 a. The edge of the pylon sign (not the pylon post) must be set back a minimum of 1 foot <br />51 from the property line adjacent to Lexington Avenue. <br /> <br /> <br />Page 5 of6 <br />