Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br /> <br /> <br />The <br />source may be <br />e. The base <br />shrubs and <br />f. The variance <br />is not issued <br /> <br /> <br />of its <br /> <br />if a <br /> <br /> <br />shall <br />1013 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />Bakeman asked if the adjoining property spotlight was in the <br />Member Doherty asked the distance of movement from the current location to the new proposed <br />location (approximately 25 feet). Member Boerigter asked if a variance is approved, will the <br />inspection department will verify location and setback. (The inspector will field the <br />setback). <br /> <br /> <br />Dan Smith explained he had no questions with the staff report. The post light (south property <br />line) would be moved to light the parking lot instead ofthe sign. <br /> <br />Marian Hewitt, 3076 North Lexington, explained it was hard to see cars coming down Lexington. <br />In the winter, there is a Christmas tree sale lot. The line of sight would be acceptable ifthe sign <br />board is heightened to nine feet approximately. Member Pust explained the visibility could be <br />improved. <br /> <br />Judy Valento, 3090 North Lexington, explained that the signage below the "drive thru" sign <br />should be removed for visibility purposes. <br /> <br />Bill Stern 3076 N. Lexington, asked for setback of temporary signs (setback a minimum of 15 <br />feet from the right-of-way). Staff will work with temporary permit issues and codes, regarding <br />the Christmas Tree sales lot. <br /> <br />Member Doherty asked if the signage removal below the "drive thru" 3'x 4' signage could be <br />removed or turned horizontal. (No permit has been issued for the placard signs below the "drive <br />thru" sign. With a sign permit, it may be possible to move and expand, and enlarge the letters, of <br />the placard message.) <br /> <br />"" <br />.J.J <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br /> <br />Chair Bakeman closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Boerigter moved, seconded by Member Doherty, to adopt a <br />Resolution approving a 29 foot Variance to Section 1005.01 (Business District Minimum <br />Dimensional Requirements) of the Roseville City Code for Dairy Queen allowing the relocation <br />of an existing pylon sign, based on the findings in Section 5 and the conditions of Section 6 of the <br />project repOlt dated May 4,2005, with the addition of Section "g": The lower pOliion (below the <br />"drive through" sign) must be removed, the dimension in height to be measured by staff, with no <br />signage below the "drive thru" sign). <br /> <br />Ayes: 3 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />5. Adjourn: 6:25 p.m. <br /> <br />Page 6 of6 <br />