My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
150212_CE_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Community Engagement Commission
>
Packets
>
2015
>
150212_CE_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2015 4:19:51 PM
Creation date
2/18/2015 10:37:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FEBRUARY 12, 2015 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM # <br />7 A 2: HOSTING A LOCAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT <br />A <br /> <br />On Friday January 30th, Scott Becker responded <br />I think this is a decent plan. <br /> <br />However, I wonder if we should try to get some input ASAP from other cities who <br />have done community/civic engagement and learn from their successes and <br />mistakes. This could be done, for example, by soliciting a representative to just <br />come talk to us at one of our meetings. We could, for example, invite a <br />representative from Edina to talk about their civic engagement module roll-out. Or <br />invite the chair of a CEC in another city to come to our meeting to talk about how <br />they do it. Stuff like that seems doable in 2015 and it can be less formal than an <br />"event". <br /> <br />My two cents, <br />Scot. <br /> <br /> <br />On Friday, January 30th, Gary Grefenberg also responded, unaware of Becker’s <br />response: <br /> <br />Theresa: <br /> <br />I had earlier added this to the agenda based upon Scot’s reminder e-mail of January 28th. Just this <br />morning I spoke with him and suggested that since you were not going to be with us at our next <br />Commission meeting that we postpone discussion to our next session in March. So I really appreciated <br />your following through with a written proposal. <br /> <br />This report will be on the agenda and included in the meeting packet, but please be aware that we may <br />not have much time for it, because of other time-sensitive items, as well as the dialogue with the <br />Minnesota Advocates for Human Rights on Civic Engagement and the Immigrant <br />Community. Depending on how much time you have, we can continue the discussion to March. <br /> <br />My immediate response to the report is that it is a great beginning, but I think you should include in <br />your target groups existing Community Engagement groups such as the Lake McCarron’s and Twin Lakes <br />Neighborhood Associations, and the Gavel Club. I think from our perspective they are as important if <br />not more so than Department Heads, with the major exception of Lonnie Brooke and the Parks <br />Department. (As of this time they are the only department doing community engagement focusing on <br />parks.) I ‘d also include Corey Yunke, Community Liaison for the Police Department. I can provide <br />contact info if you wish, and will raise these suggestions at the meeting. <br /> <br />I’d also broaden your research search to other Twin Cities suburbs, especially inner-ring, who have staff <br />or groups similar to ours, such as the Community Engagement Initiative in Brooklyn Park and Edina’s <br />community engagement efforts (search both Volunteer and Speak Up). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.