My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03643
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3600
>
pf_03643
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:40:58 PM
Creation date
6/20/2006 11:47:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3643
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
936 HIGHWAY 36 W
Applicant
Nasim Ayub
Status
Approved
PIN
112923340007
Date Final Variance Board Action
6/1/2005
Planning Files - Resolution #
17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />variances from the literal instances where their <br />would cause circumstances to <br />the individual property under and to such variances when <br />it is demonstrated that such actions win be in with the spirit and intent <br />the ordinance. "Undue as used in with the a <br />variance means the property in cannot be to a use if used <br />under conditions allowed the controls, the plight of the landowner is due <br />to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the <br />variance, if granted, win not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic <br />considerations alone shaH not constitute an undue if reasonable use for the <br />property exists under the terms of the ordinance.... The board or governing body as <br />the case may be may impose conditions in the granting of variances to insure <br />compliance and to protect". <br /> <br />5.8 The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls: The Ayubs have options available that do not require a <br />variance. First, they could place coniferous vegetation along the borders. However, this <br />option does not provide immediate privacy and does little to screen vehicles and reduce <br />noise of Highway 36. The trees are susceptible to salt damage. Second, they could install <br />a 3 to 4 foot tall dirt berm and a 4 foot tall fence. This option, while legal, circumvents <br />the intent of the City Code and is not supported by staff. The benn could also impact <br />drainage on the Ayub and adjoining neighbors parcels. The Staff has determined that <br />the property can be put to a reasonable use under the official controls if a front yard <br />fence height VARIANCE is granted. <br /> <br />5.9 The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created <br />by the landowner: The property is unique of the frontage to Highway 36, but access from <br />Sherrell. The plat was approved in 1946, while the house was built in1953 - both before <br />the current City Code. A standard street would have lots or parcels that slope or "blend" <br />into a curb edge, then drop down 6 inches to the street surface. The Ayub lot does not <br />meet those criteria for Highway 36, which design makes it difficult to create privacy and <br />reduce noise, even if installing a regulation fence. Because of the change in elevation <br />(grade) the installation of an 8 foot fence along the north side and a 6 foot fence along the <br />east and west sides may provide some privacy. The Staff has determined that the <br />plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the neighborhood and <br />property, and not created by the landowner. <br /> <br />5.10 The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: Although <br />City staff was unable to find a fence taller than 4 feet along the Highway 36 corridor in <br />this neighborhood, but there is a significant amount of vegetation - any fence should be <br />of earthern tones to blends as much as possible. The fence would have little impact on the <br />general public. The Staff concluded that a fence iu a residential area should not <br />exceed 8 feet in height and that a 2 foot to 4 foot VARIANCE to Section l012.02B2 <br />of the Rosevine City Code win not alter the essential character of the locality, nor <br /> <br />PF3643_RVBA_(0601 05).doc- Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.