CC_Minutes_2015_0126 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,January 26, 2015 Page 20 Beyond those options and for future consideration, Mr. Culver noted that the other component of solar power was whether or not a community solar garden was via- ble as a future and separate component, with individuals allowed the opportunity to purchase shares of the overall system, with individuals then receiving a credit on their electric bill for the share of power generated. Under this system, Mr. Culver advised that there would be administrative costs, tax reporting required, and management of shares that would add some cost to the overall system, which staff and the PWETC were still investigating before making a recommendation to the City Council. Mr. Culver noted that there were pros and cons to consider, and additional consultations with various organizations to determine if this was a via- ble option to offer Roseville residents. Mr. Culver advised that, at this time, the PWETC's recommendations were pro- vided on lines 36 — 42 of the RCA to provide the most cost-effective method. Based on that recommendation, Mr. Culver noted that two proposals had been re- ceived as detailed in lines 57—60 of the RCA, with staff recommending TruNorth and combining the SPPA loan with a third party power purchase agreement as outlined in the RCA. Mr. Culver advised that the recommendation was to consid- er the fire hall and City Hall roofs, with two Made in Minnesota, reserving the larger roof space for a potential 100 Kw system. Mr. Culver clarified the options available for additional City savings under the TruNorth proposal; displaying total savings available. Councilmember Laliberte asked if staff was aware of any other communities do- ing private/public partnerships that would address administrative cost concerns. Public Works Director Duane Schwartz advised that staff was hearing from other communities that with this type of program and a guaranteed energy savings, it was beneficial to have a third party as a partner so they took on the risk and guar- anteed the performance of the system. Mr. Schwartz opined that the cost in staff time and money should be minimal under that third party arrangement. Mayor Roe clarified that costs for a community solar garden and associated shares and costs would be handled by a third party. Mr. Culver advised that this was the part staff was seeking to gather additional in- formation on, to research the true costs for third party administration of the sys- tem, and at what point it made sense. Councilmember Laliberte noted that the Fire Department used the fire station roof for training purpose, and questioned impacts with a solar installation, especially given the significant investment in that station and impacts to firefighter safety and ability to use that training area.