My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03178
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3100
>
pf_03178
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:42:33 PM
Creation date
5/9/2007 9:12:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3178
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
Address
2001 FULHAM ST N
Project Name
Midland Hills Country Club
Applicant
Midland Hills Country Club
Status
Approved
Date Final City Council Action
3/27/2000
Date Final Planning Commission Action
2/9/2000
Planning Files - Resolution #
9758
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
231
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br /> <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br /> <br />1 ~ 00 <br />no the from north and <br />northwest. berm and plantings must extend site. Being <br />adjacent to the club is a building be large close to homes, <br />especially "party end" of the building with its noise. Parking lot noise has not <br />been addressed or <br /> <br /> <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br /> <br /> <br />35 <br /> <br />36 <br /> <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br /> <br /> <br />40 <br />41 <br /> <br />IS to <br />south). compared buildings It is too large a suburban <br />site. He recommended: l) No access from Midland Hills or Rosewood Lane. 2) <br />final landscape plan should by the Council. 3) final lighting <br />plan should be approved by the Council. 4) Noise outside the building should be <br />a statement an <br />abatement plan (as per Code, Section for the patios and the parking <br />is no grading, landscaping, lighting, and future development IS <br />uncertainty about the ultimate use. <br /> <br /> <br />43 <br /> <br /> <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes, February 9, 2000 <br /> <br />Page 4 of9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.