Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br /> <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br /> <br />1 ~ 00 <br />no the from north and <br />northwest. berm and plantings must extend site. Being <br />adjacent to the club is a building be large close to homes, <br />especially "party end" of the building with its noise. Parking lot noise has not <br />been addressed or <br /> <br /> <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br /> <br /> <br />35 <br /> <br />36 <br /> <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br /> <br /> <br />40 <br />41 <br /> <br />IS to <br />south). compared buildings It is too large a suburban <br />site. He recommended: l) No access from Midland Hills or Rosewood Lane. 2) <br />final landscape plan should by the Council. 3) final lighting <br />plan should be approved by the Council. 4) Noise outside the building should be <br />a statement an <br />abatement plan (as per Code, Section for the patios and the parking <br />is no grading, landscaping, lighting, and future development IS <br />uncertainty about the ultimate use. <br /> <br /> <br />43 <br /> <br /> <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes, February 9, 2000 <br /> <br />Page 4 of9 <br />