Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />^' <br />j <br /> <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />7 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br /> <br /> <br />on <br /> <br />concerns. <br /> <br />concerns <br /> <br /> <br />request <br />plans dated <br /> <br /> <br />meet the criteria listed in Section 1013.0ID of the Roseville <br />is a conditional use as stipulated in Section <br />Residential District and is consistent with the <br /> <br />The <br />Single <br />Plan. <br /> <br /> <br />2. Over the course of the past two staff has reviewed four site <br />clubhouse and site modifications. The set, dated the as <br />February 4, 2000, is considered the Master Plan. An reviews and conditions specified <br />below are based upon these <br /> <br /> <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />A<; <br />'"TJ <br /> <br />3. Staff has determined the setbacks for the meet or exceed the Ordinance <br />requirements for structure and parking lot locations. Though there are no specific standards for <br />setbacks other than the 50-foot minimum requirement, staff uses the business structure and <br />standards. the case of the structure, the 150- foot setback from line <br />exceeds the of 30 feet for business structure <br /> <br /> <br />4. The lot setback of 135 feet from the nearest residential property line <br />exceeds the 10 foot business lot setback The site also a <br />buffer than the 10 foot buffer for business adjacent residential <br />districts. <br /> <br />46 <br /> <br />5. The basement area of the clubhouse shall be used for office <br />storage and golf cart storage. future in the use of the basement area to <br />other than indicated above may require an amendment to the CUP. <br /> <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br /> <br />6. Staff has determined the revised landscape plan to meets or exceeds the requirements contained <br />in the City Code. The proposal also provides greater screening to address neighborhood concerns. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes, February 9, 2000 <br /> <br />Page 5 of9 <br />