Laserfiche WebLink
489 Mr. Culver referenced related City Code, Chapter 802.07 as previously discussed <br />490 tonight for the water portion of the discussion, with Section 802.06.L spelling out <br />491 those specific maintenance areas. <br />492 <br />493 Chair Stenlund noted his personal interested initially in Section 801.08 specific to <br />494 excavation and construction requirements, especially in consideration of MS4 <br />495 drainage requirements, and tree resource damages and ownership of trees in <br />496 public rights-of-way or areas of open -cut excavation. Chair Stenlund asked that <br />497 staff provide information on that as part of upcoming discussions, and whether <br />498 those are addressed elsewhere in City CodeAthanformation <br />duly noted by staff. Chair <br />499 Stenlund noted the ongoing need to include for <br />500 enforcement purposes. <br />501 <br />502 Chair Stenlund further noted references in age specific to private use <br />503 of water tower connections; with Mr. Culvsection of code was <br />504 written in 1964, and while updated in 1995, was in need of updating beyond the <br />505 City Council charge to make recommendations on ownership of sewer and water <br />506 laterals. 1% <br />507 46 <br />508 9. Victoria Street Reconstruction Plan Review <br />509 As detailed in the staff report, Mr. Culver provi ed a review of the Victoria Street <br />510 Reconstruction plans, and public informational meetings held to -date. <br />511 <br />512 As part of his presentation, Mr. Culver reviewed parking, mailboxes, unique <br />513 project features, Minnesota State Aid (MSA) design requirements; storm sewer <br />514 4schedule <br />ement; kconst <br />aining the existing characteristics to the extent <br />515 <br />516 <br />517er further reviing for the project including MSA funds, utility <br />518 d some assessmated at $150,000 of the total $1.3 million <br />519sidewalk conssts partially funded by Park Renewal Project <br />520 rids;rk land; cemeot assessable per state law; and work plan <br />521 during the 20ction season. <br />522 <br />523 Mr. Cuought input at this time from the PWETC, especially related to <br />524 vertical anorizontal curves not meeting 40 mph design speeds and potential <br />525 changes inWhroadway profile. Given issues that could significantly impact <br />526 existing driveways, receipt of an MSA variance to retain the 20 mph speed at the <br />527 curve at Reservoir Woods, and considering the all -way stop at Roselawn Avenue, <br />528 Mr. Culver asked the PWETC's consideration in declaring Victoria Street as a 30 <br />529 mph urban section road to address geometric design concerns, reducing current 40 <br />530 mph posted speeds. Given that this is a local street with significant residential <br />531 footage, Mr. Culver noted that problems were encountered managing speeds <br />532 along some areas. In an effort to reduce current predominant speeds of in excess <br />533 of 40 mph, Mr. Culver noted the intentional narrower lane reconstruction that <br />534 would serve as a traffic calming aspect. Mr. Culver noted that residents would <br />Page 12 of 14 <br />