Laserfiche WebLink
Marc Culver, PE <br />City of Roseville <br />Table 2. Existing P.M. Peak Hour Operations Analysis <br />Intersection <br />Level of Service <br />County Road C and Cleveland Avenue <br />C <br />County Road C and Prior Avenue <br />B <br />County Road C and Fairview Avenue <br />C <br />County Road C and Lincoln Drive <br />F <br />County Road C and Snelling Avenue <br />F <br />County Road D and NB 1-35W Ramps <br />B <br />County Road D and Cleveland Avenue <br />C <br />County Road D and Fairview Avenue/New Brighton Road (2) <br />C <br />Twin Lakes Parkway and Mount Ridge Road (3) <br />A <br />Cleveland Avenue and NB 1-35W Ramps/Twin Lakes Parkway <br />C <br />Cleveland Avenue and Iona Lane(') <br />A/A <br />Cleveland Avenue and County Road C2(1) <br />A/B <br />Fairview Avenue and Terrace Drive(') <br />A/A <br />Fairview Avenue and Lydia Avenue (2) <br />B <br />Snelling Avenue and County Road C2 <br />D <br />Snelling Avenue and Lydia Avenue <br />C <br />February 12, 2015 <br />Page 7 <br />(1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst <br />approach LOS. <br />(2) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with all -way stop control. <br />(3) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with roundabout control. <br />The operational issues at the County Road C/Lincoln Drive intersection are a result of poor <br />operations and significant eastbound queues at the County Road C/Snelling Avenue intersection. To <br />mitigate this situation, modifications are necessary to the at -grade intersections along Snelling <br />Avenue or additional capacity is needed along the Snelling Avenue corridor. For purposes of this <br />analysis an additional lane in each direction is assumed under future conditions (six -lane Snelling <br />Avenue facility). <br />Year 2030 Forecasts <br />Trip Generation <br />SRF worked with City staff to identify redevelopment opportunities in the study area. Parcels, which <br />were not expected to redevelop or change in land use by the year 2030 were identified and are <br />shown in Figure 3. The remaining parcels are expected to redevelop. City staff provided the <br />appropriate land assumptions to use for the developable parcels to create a realistic land use plan. <br />These land use assumptions are relatively consistent with Land Use Scenario C from the Twin Lakes <br />Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Update Technical Memorandum Traffic, Air and Noise Analysis, <br />dated July 3, 2007. <br />