Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION <br />12/08/2014 <br /> Agenda Date: <br /> Agenda Item: 14.a <br />Department Approval City Manager Approval <br />Item Description: Request by the Community Development Department for direction on the <br />creation of a formal Voluntary Environmental Assessment Worksheet <br />(EAW) Waiver process for projects zoned Community Mixed-Use (CMU) <br />in the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area (. <br />) <br />PROJ0032 <br />B <br />ACKGROUND <br />On September 15, 2014, the Community Development Department met with the City Council to <br />1 <br />discuss the existing voluntary Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) and waiver process <br />2 <br />that is currently required for developments in theCommunity Mixed Use District (CMU), which <br />3 <br />affects the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area. The purpose of staff’s discussion with the Council <br />4 <br />was to better understand the necessity of the EAW and to determine whether a waiver process <br />5 <br />should be created, and if such a process was created what its requirements might look like. <br />6 <br />Staff noted that an EAW waiver process would not have to be an “all or nothing” approval and <br />7 <br />that the City Council could waive the EAW but still require an applicant to submit information to <br />8 <br />support areas of environmental concern applicable to a site (such as traffic impacts, water <br />9 <br />quality, hazardous materials, etc.) There appeared to be some City Council consensus around <br />10 <br />the approach outlined above, and it was mentioned that the goal was not to unnecessarily burden <br />11 <br />applicants but to focus on the issues of concern by using a City “mini-EAW” process. <br />12 <br />Staff advised the City Council that the City could take the key pieces it was considering from an <br />13 <br />EAW and include them as a requirement in a waiver process. This would require a developer to <br />14 <br />provide those items to demonstrate that there is no need to go further, much like the formal EAW <br />15 <br />process, and it would allow staff to know of any hot-button issues. Council also discussed <br />16 <br />incorporating a draft EAW as part of any waiver requirement, with approval or denial at the <br />17 <br />discretion of the City Council on a case-by-case basis. <br />18 <br />Over the past two months the Planning Division has reviewed the existing EAW, discussed <br />19 <br />further the purpose of the EAW requirement and the desired outcome, and the potential of a <br />20 <br />waiver process. <br />21 <br />PEA <br />ROPOSEDNVIRONMENTALNALYSIS <br />22 <br />The Planning Division’s main suggestion is to eliminate the required voluntary EAW (not a <br />23 <br />mandatory EAW as required under Chapter 4410 Minnesota Administrative Rules) for <br />24 <br />development proposals within Twin Lakes. To replace this process, staff is proposing a City <br />25 <br />environmental review process that is modeled on the State’s EAW process, but acknowledges <br />26 <br />the understanding that was obtained in the AUAR process, focuses on the issues relevant to the <br />27 <br />site, and reduces the time/expense associated with completing a full EAW. <br />28 <br />PROJ0032_EAW_Waiver_RCA_120814.doc <br />Page 1 of 6 <br /> <br />