My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0209
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2015 2:49:36 PM
Creation date
3/2/2015 2:49:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/9/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,February 9, 2015 <br /> Page 18 <br /> get some consensus from the City Council as to whether or not and whether or not <br /> they would support using TIF for the project or not. <br /> City Council Response <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated that, in general, she preferred to use TIF for pro- <br /> jects bringing long-term jobs to the City. While being less desirous of housing <br /> use, Councilmember Laliberte stated that she understood it was used for housing <br /> many situations, and therefore would not rule it out. Given the TIF request, com- <br /> bined with WAC, SAC, and HRA monies, Councilmember Laliberte opined that <br /> it was a considerable financial request, and recognized that a public hearing <br /> would be required in the future for establishing a TIF District. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that this would be part of the process after a formal TIF ap- <br /> plication was received; and City Manager Trudgeon confirmed that it would be <br /> several months for that process once an application was received. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, City Manager Trudgeon clarified that SAC and <br /> WAC credits were pooled or banked credits on hand and not from taxpayer funds, <br /> but totaling approximately$1 million based on Metropolitan Council fees. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte opined that this was a valuable proposal was valuable <br /> to the City and would improve housing options beyond existing options. Coun- <br /> cilmember Laliberte stated that there were people interested in living in Roseville <br /> and the City Council was interested in welcoming them into the community; how- <br /> ever, not too heavily on the backs of current residents. <br /> If the project could be further refined to meet what the neighborhood and she <br /> wanted to see, Councilmember McGehee stated that she was not opposed to the <br /> use of TIF even though she preferred it be used for living wage job creations that <br /> were severely needed in this community. However, Councilmember McGehee <br /> stated that she was still on the fence in terms of this project, and would withhold <br /> further support until she heard how and if it was supported in the community and <br /> impacts to the general tax base, as well as how that housing looked in welcoming <br /> people into the community. <br /> Mayor Roe noted the lack of consensus, duly noted by Mr. Sherman. <br /> Recess <br /> Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 7:57 p.m., and reconvened at approximately <br /> 8:01 p.m. <br /> b. Housing& Redevelopment Authority (HRA)Joint Meeting <br /> HRA Members Present: Chair Dean Maschka and Members Susan Elkins, Vickie <br /> Lee, and Dan Wall, along with Councilmember Jason Etten. <br /> Presentation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.