My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0209
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2015 2:49:36 PM
Creation date
3/2/2015 2:49:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/9/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 9, 2015 <br /> Page 33 <br /> Mr. Bowman responded that he thought it would require some investment of staff <br /> time to stay on top of posts and steer them to appropriate staff for their response <br /> and/or comment; as well as to allow the City Council and staff to throw out ideas <br /> for which they were seeking feedback. Mr. Bowman advised that he envisioned <br /> that he and/or Ms. Curti would need to monitor the site frequently. <br /> Mr. Becker noted that the Commission was cognizant that they were adding to <br /> staff's burden, but also wanted to be sure staff was aware of the issues within the <br /> community. <br /> Councilmember Willmus expressed his appreciation that it allowed a platform for <br /> broader city awareness and the ability to weigh in with City Hall. Councilmem- <br /> ber Willmus questioned if staff had researched other communities using this <br /> module to see how it was working for them. <br /> Mr. Bowman advised that he had only been able to reach out to the City of Edina <br /> to-date, but would further research current customers by asking Granicus to pro- <br /> vide a list of other communities using their product. <br /> Councilmember Willmus clarified that he was not concerned with Granicus but <br /> the concept in general, duly noted by Mr. Bowman. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte expressed her appreciation that the module was open to <br /> the entire community and not just one neighborhood of constellation boundary or <br /> organization. However, Councilmember Laliberte expressed concern in how the <br /> module was moderated and community engagement ensured to avoid degradation. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte noted another topic addressed at the recent LMC con- <br /> ference was pros and cons of module moderation by a third party hosting the site <br /> versus staff filtering what is or is not seen. Councilmember Laliberte noted one <br /> suggestion made during the conference was that the community could vote <br /> thumbs up or down on items they found offensive and didn't not want included on <br /> the site versus staff having to chose what does or does not get posted. If the mod- <br /> ule is pursued, Councilmember Laliberte asked that the follow/share option be <br /> used and an option be included that provided a opportunity for community volun- <br /> teers connecting with issues; and that it include a process or ability to report is- <br /> sues (e.g. potholes). <br /> Councilmember Etten noted that the City's website already had this function <br /> available. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte opined that there needed to be a way to promote it and <br /> make people aware of that option. Councilmember Laliberte expressed her inter- <br /> est in hearing about best practices and lessons learned from others using the prod- <br /> uct since starting its use, and how much staff time. If the survey function was go- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.