My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0223
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0223
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2015 10:53:14 AM
Creation date
3/6/2015 10:41:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/23/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 23, 2015 <br /> Page 25 <br /> with Phase I consisting of six units along Cope Avenue, then selling each addi- <br /> tional building with construction to continue nonstop. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated that he had some concerns with the phased ap- <br /> proach, especially since some of it centered around demolition of the former fire <br /> station, thereby eliminating any potential use of that facility by the City in another <br /> capacity. If the building is razed, Councilmember Willmus noted that such an op- <br /> tion was no longer available for the City, especially should future phases did not <br /> occur. Councilmember Willmus admitted his frustration with the process, and <br /> expressed appreciation to GMHC for their e-mail correspondence received today, <br /> that served to shed some light on things for him. Councilmember Willmus ad- <br /> vised that one of those concerns was his confusion as to why GMHC didn't pur- <br /> sue an extension of their Preliminary Development Agreement, which that corre- <br /> spondence indicated they had done, causing him to reconsider tonight's recom- <br /> mended action. <br /> While not knowing where his colleagues stood, Councilmember Willmus stated <br /> that he was not comfortable taking action tonight to terminate City involvement, <br /> since he did not feel he had all of the pertinent information and background on the <br /> negotiations to-date, and needed to obtain that information from staff. Coun- <br /> cilmember Willmus further state that he was not putting a motion on the floor at <br /> this time,but suggested it may be prudent for the City Council to step back to col- <br /> lect and gather information and then determine where they were at in the process <br /> and what was needed to proceed, including a clear timeline before entertaining <br /> additional conversation. At this point, Councilmember Willmus stated that he <br /> would not support the City Manager's recommendation to terminate. <br /> Mayor Roe stated that he needed to understand better from GMHC representa- <br /> tives and City staff how the City's interests would best be protected if units <br /> moved quicker in the market place that indicated by the appraisal; and if entering <br /> into a Development Agreement resulting in all three phases being completed, <br /> what recourse would be available if not accomplished, and that would be clear to <br /> all parties. Mayor Roe stated that this was a key aspect for him in his decision- <br /> making. Mayor Roe noted this may relate to figuring out the market after Phase I <br /> and if a better appraisal became available as a result of that phase. <br /> Ms. Olson advised that, while constructing Phase I, GMHC intended to be mar- <br /> keting Phase II and would be able to get an appraisal based on that one project. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte asked Re/Max representatives asked if they had seen <br /> the eighteen unit proposal provided by GMHC. <br /> Mr. Stockwell confirmed that they had seen the same one-page site plan provided <br /> to the City Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.