My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0223
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0223
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2015 10:53:14 AM
Creation date
3/6/2015 10:41:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/23/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 23, 2015 <br /> Page 30 <br /> the City, he also understood Mr. Buelow's concerns that it affected marketability <br /> of the project. Mr. McNamara clarified that the bank was not intending to take <br /> the fire station as security, but was concerned about the overall marketability of <br /> the site and project, with differences in whether or not the fire station remained <br /> perhaps negligible. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that the fire station could come down provided <br /> sufficient protections were included in the Development Agreement to protect the <br /> City for any loss incurred, which was one point of negotiation. Councilmember <br /> Willmus recognized concerns of the bank and GMHC in marketing the project; <br /> however, he opined that a way could be found to make this work and protect the <br /> City's future interest in the property if the development should fail. <br /> Ms. Olson opined that this could be dealt with early on in the project, as the speed <br /> at which the units were selling should be obvious. <br /> Motion to Extend <br /> At approximately 9:56 p.m., Laliberte moved, Willmus seconded, extending the meeting beyond <br /> the curfew for the purpose of completing discussion on this item (14.c) and the following item, <br /> 14.b scheduled for open session. <br /> Amendment <br /> McGehee moved, Etten seconded, a friendly amendment to complete only this item (14.c) and no <br /> other agenda items. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Etten as to Councilmember McGehee's rationale in not com- <br /> pleting other items on the agenda, Councilmember McGehee responded that she had a number of <br /> comments on item 14.b and did not wish to delay the meeting longer. <br /> Roll Call (Amendment) <br /> Ayes: Willmus, Etten, McGehee and Laliberte. <br /> Nays: Roe. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Roll Call (Original Motion as Amended) <br /> Ayes: Willmus, Etten., and McGehee. <br /> Nays: Laliberte and Roe. <br /> In response to having a single entity involved Councilmember McGehee also not- <br /> ed the need to determine which option to move forward with; opining that she <br /> found the 18 unit proposal more agreeable and salable to the community. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that there remained several unanswered questions, but they all <br /> did not have to be resolved tonight, but that a decision providing clear direction to <br /> staff did need to be made tonight. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.