My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-02-27_HRA_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2015
>
2015-02-27_HRA_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2015 3:14:27 PM
Creation date
3/12/2015 3:14:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/27/2015
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br /> <br />City Manager Trudgeon advised that, based upon that lack of clear direction by the <br />HRA, he was recommending that the City Council withdraw from the project, with <br />rationale for that recommendation detailed in the Request for Council Action dated <br />February 23, 2015. Mr. Trudgeon advised that this action would serve to formally <br />alert the GMHC and HRA of the City Council rescinding their support of the <br />current project, and remove the Citys former fire station property from the picture. <br />Mr. Trudgeon expressed his opinion that the City had been more than fair in the <br />lengthy timeframe for getting this development proposal to move forward, and with <br />expiration of the Preliminary Development Agreement some time ago, it was time <br />to make this difficult decision. <br /> <br />Another concern expressed by City Manager Trudgeon was that, if the first phase <br />of the project, which appears to be financially viable, was to proceed, but the other <br />two phases did not come to fruition, it could lead to the City and HRA being left <br />with less than desirable properties for further development. Mr. Trudgeon noted <br />that it was obvious that the first phase was needed to help finance future phases, <br />which at this time remained only a hope with no guarantee. <br /> <br />City Manager Trudgeon opined that the ongoing wait and see saga, and potential <br />of multi-year construction was disruptive to neighbors; and if a new developer was <br />sought, it would still probably required a phased approach as originally planned by <br />GMHC, but would hopefully be less disruptive. <br /> <br />City Manager Trudgeon advised that, by the City Council taking this recommended <br />action; it would then open up the way for the City Council and HRA to hold a joint <br />meeting to discuss next steps. Mr. Trudgeon noted, no matter whether or not the <br />property was put back on the market or what type of project resulted, it was <br />important that the neighborhood be kept aware of future discussions and subsequent <br />actions. Mr. Trudgeon recommended that the City Council act as he proposed, and <br />move forward to make that decision. <br /> <br />Carolyn Olson, President of Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation <br />(GMHC) <br />At the invitation of Mayor Roe, Ms. Olson advised that the prices for Phase II and <br />III were something GMHC felt it could achieve; and once the townhomes were <br />under construction and pre-marketing was underway, they anticipated once five <br />were sold, the bank would be willing to move onto the next phase. Ms. Olson <br />opined that the appraisal comparables were good and they could build to meet that <br />market. <br /> <br />Ms. Olson advised that the entire development team was available tonight for any <br />questions or to provide additional information at the City Councils request, <br />including the RE/MAX realtors chosen to market the project in all of its phases. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.