My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-02-27_HRA_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2015
>
2015-02-27_HRA_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2015 3:14:27 PM
Creation date
3/12/2015 3:14:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/27/2015
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />REQUEST FOR HRA ACTION <br /> <br /> <br />Date: 2-27-15 <br />Item No: 9a. <br />Staff Approval: Agenda Section: <br /> <br /> Action <br /> <br />Item Description: Dale Street Fire Station Site Redevelopment <br /> (HF_0117) <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />2 1.0 <br />Requested Action <br />3 Offer a motion to authorize HRA staff and the HRA attorney to explore the correct legal <br />4 process, begin negotiations with the City and prepare the required documents necessary to <br />5 sell the HRA owned parcels to the City Council. <br />6 <br />7 2.0 <br />Background <br />8 Prior to December 31, 2014, the City Council and the RHRA had a Memorandum of <br />9 Understanding (MOU) in place that positioned the RHRA as the lead body in the <br />10 negotiations, review and approval of the Dale Street Fire Station project development <br />11 agreement. That MOU has expired. Since that time, the project has been attempting to <br />12 move forward with parallel approvals from both the RHRA and the City Council which <br />13 has resulted in a lot of back and forth meetings between the two bodies. <br />14 <br />15 The MOU anticipated that ultimately, the City Council would be funding all the land <br />16 purchase via the City Councils Tax Increment Financing (TIF) funds. The MOU <br />17 anticipated this would occur through simultaneous closings so that the TIF funds would <br />18 flow through the developer to the RHRA. <br />19 <br />20 At the February 23, 2015 City Council meeting, the City Council discussed the <br />21 operational difficulties related to the past couple of months in regards to negotiating, <br />22 review and approvals in this parallel process. The City Council expressed appreciation to <br />23 the RHRA for all of its efforts to get the deal to this point, and particularly with leading <br />24 the neighborhood input process. However, the City Council felt that it might be better <br />25 structured to handle the frequent and sometimes unexpected actions that will be necessary <br />26 to complete this project since the City Council has a much more frequent meeting <br />27 schedule. The City Council then unanimously passed a motion to ask the RHRA whether <br />28 it would be willing to consider an arrangement where the RHRA owned land would be <br />29 purchased by the City Councils TIF funds in advance of the eventual property closing <br />30 with the developer thereby enabling the City Council to more easily facilitate negotiations <br />31 and development agreement approvals. <br />32 <br />33 The Citys bond attorney has provided an initial opinion that this kind of arrangement <br />34 would be possible, but she has not been able to review the necessary documents yet to <br />RHRA_ Agenda (2-27-15) - Page 1 of 2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.