My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0218
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0218
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2015 2:13:38 PM
Creation date
3/27/2015 2:11:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/15/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Meeting Retreat <br /> Tuesday,February 18, 2015 <br /> Page 36 <br /> Community Development Director Bilotta noted that the data received may not be <br /> the same,recognizing that the Public Works Department had some complex track- <br /> ing software, while other departments (e.g. Finance or Community Development) <br /> may need to quantify the data on the number of licenses and/or permits and over <br /> time, different information may come out of each department. However, Mr. Bi- <br /> lotta stated that his department could jump into it slowly without a lot of extra <br /> time being required. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested always remaining focused on the objectives, if measuring <br /> whether or not they're achieving the desired outcome. <br /> Police Chief Mathwig advised that in order to do performance measures in his de- <br /> partment, cost may prove difficult to define as the department itself had many <br /> layers to it and all were measured differently, whether the number of traffic stops, <br /> citations written, and record technician time involved for the traffic enforcement <br /> division; the time required for training and or maintenance for squads; or other <br /> divisions. While the oversights were already being done, Chief Mathwig opined <br /> it would be difficult to put a figure to them. When looking at performance meas- <br /> urements. Chief Mathwig advised that their achievements were addressed in the <br /> community survey, as an example, with the satisfaction or lack thereof for resi- <br /> dents feeling safe in their home, while shopping at Rosedale, or while driving <br /> down the street, all subjective. <br /> Councilmember Etten recognized that each responsibility may not have an associ- <br /> ated fee as with other departments; and questioned how the information would be <br /> made available in many areas. <br /> Councilmember McGehee concurred, opining that she wasn't interested in a lot of <br /> that information, stating that she found the satisfaction survey fine for her use. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that if staff told her they were happy and since <br /> it was the City Manager's job to keep them happy, while looking for efficiencies <br /> and encouraging staff to work together as applicable, that was enough for her. <br /> Mayor Roe agreed with part of that perception; however, he suggested identifying <br /> a target of two initiatives within the entire organization where costs could be con- <br /> solidated where they were currently spread out in several departments, or identify- <br /> ing several projects with cross-department efforts and cost savings that could be <br /> achieved in doing so. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte suggested centralized supply purchases as an example. <br /> Mr. Rapp summarized the KOI as identifying two areas or programs/services ver- <br /> sus creating a set of measures, clarifying that it constituted an outcome. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.