Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Meeting Retreat <br /> Tuesday, February 17, 2015 <br /> Page 11 <br /> or issues to maximize. Mr. Rapp noted a parallel exercise would be to match weaknesses <br /> and threats to define strategic issues to minimize. At the conclusion of this break-out ex- <br /> ercise, Mr. Rapp advised that the groups would again combine and report their findings. <br /> Mr. Rapp opined that this should provide a clear picture of things right in front of us that <br /> tended to trip up our goals or keep us from achieving objectives. <br /> The STRENGTHS/OPPORTUNITIES groups combined (Mayor Roe, Councilmembers <br /> Laliberte and Etten, City Manager Trudgeon, Police Chief Mathwig, and Parks & Recrea- <br /> tion Director Brokke). <br /> The WEAKNESSES/THREATS groups combined (Councilmembers Willmus and <br /> McGehee, Finance Director Miller, Public Works Director Schwartz, Community Devel- <br /> opment Director Bilotta, and Fire Chief O'Neill). <br /> As an example, Mr. Rapp clarified that the intent of the exercise was how to leverage <br /> strengths and opportunities that represented inherent things in the organization or com- <br /> munity; and strategic issues to maximize and issues to minimize as well. Mr. Rapp ad- <br /> vised that step three in the exercise would be to combine all four SWOT again as a full <br /> group to determine any crossover items and determine what strategic issues or challenges <br /> emerged. <br /> Reports from the groups were as follows: <br /> STRENGTHS/OPPORTUNITIES <br /> (Summarized for the group by City Manager Trudgeon) <br /> 1) Engagement/collaboration of citizens and staff— volunteering, connecting to neigh- <br /> borhood groups <br /> 2) Redevelopment sites — financial health/citizens/location — get what we want, not just <br /> be reactive to what development wants to locate in Roseville <br /> 3) Employees/new ideas? <br /> WEAKNESSES/THREATS <br /> (Summarized for the group by Councilmember McGehee) <br /> 1) Minimize ineffective allocation of available resources <br /> 2) Consider public safety impacts on day-to-day decisions <br /> 3) Ineffective decision-making/politics <br /> 4) Housing diversity/quality <br /> 5) Ineffective public engagement <br /> Discussion ensued as Mr. Rapp asked for obvious items participants observed: <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated that weaknesses are opportunities (e.g. community en- <br /> gagement,housing, redevelopment efforts). <br /> Councilmember Etten questioned what"ineffective decision-making"meant. <br />