My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0217
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0217
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2015 4:09:05 PM
Creation date
3/27/2015 4:07:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/17/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Meeting Retreat <br /> Tuesday, February 17, 2015 <br /> Page 12 <br /> On behalf of their group, Community Development Director responded that it was meant <br /> as looking backwards versus forward through dwelling on issues that involved personal <br /> attacks and tended to delay decision-making. <br /> Councilmember Etten questioned how that played into ineffective decision-making ver- <br /> sus public engagement and if that delayed decision making came from ineffective, mis- <br /> construed public engagement. <br /> Participants concurred that those were connected, but Mr. Rapp opined that to him they <br /> seemed to come from two distinct realms: ineffective decision-making in the governance <br /> realm (decision-making), and ineffective public engagement based on on-the-ground pub- <br /> lic deployment(community outreach). <br /> Councilmember Etten admitted his struggle to connect communities and engagement and <br /> the difference in community engagement held upfront, paused, or completely destroyed <br /> and that ramification on decision-making, with a decision needed on how to do decision- <br /> making while still generally engaging the public. <br /> Mr. Rapp suggested defining one of the challenges as: "ineffective/effective decision- <br /> making." Mr. Rapp noted this could be broadened into the category of governance by <br /> making decisions as a governing body that determined the needs of stakeholders and ex- <br /> pectations of citizens, since the group concurred that they seemed to be tied together. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that from her perspective it was less politics than pro- <br /> cess. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte opined that public safety also went into the engage- <br /> ment/collaboration category, since recent community survey information indicated that <br /> public safety mattered to citizens, and while there was no indication that the current sta- <br /> tus was wrong or bad, it was an important issue for the community. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that it was an overarching concept, and he saw it as <br /> broader than just crime but incorporating all areas of public safety. <br /> Community Development Director Bilotta opined that public safety needed to be a con- <br /> sideration in all decisions, since it was not done in a vacuum, and should enter into the <br /> discussion earlier in the process. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte applauded the group for including that item, as she found it ty- <br /> ing to many other things, including housing values that could be affected if not addressed. <br /> Councilmember Willmus concurred, opining that was a good observation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.