Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Meeting Retreat <br /> Tuesday,February 17, 2015 <br /> Page 4 <br /> Four Core Cultures: <br /> Control culture (military—command and control) <br /> Competence culture(research lab/u—best and brightest) <br /> Collaboration culture(family—teams) <br /> Cultivation culture(church-mission/values) <br /> As part of the upcoming exercise, Mr. Rapp advised that the questions should consider <br /> who the City is and who they wanted to be without constraint as they considered which of <br /> the four core cultures were appropriate in each area. <br /> At the end of the exercise, Mr. Rapp and participants reviewed survey results and those <br /> results specific to the City Council, those of staff, and the combined value for each. Mr. <br /> Rapp summarized the results indicated participants wanted to have a"cultivation culture" <br /> seeking "customer intimacy" in a collaborative environment. Mr. Rapp advised that this <br /> is a common desire in most organizations, and the next step would be to reconcile wheth- <br /> er it could be done, and if done, what it meant to the organization known as the City of <br /> Roseville. <br /> Reactions from Participants <br /> Councilmember Etten opined that you didn't need to spend money or find more money <br /> resources to be customer intimate, while you may decide to spend available money dif- <br /> ferently or approach people differently. Based on his experience in serving on the Parks <br /> & Recreation Commission and development and implementation of the Parks Renewal <br /> Program, Councilmember Etten noted that significant amount of time spend deciding <br /> what to do and the details involved, with the result being a process not just to build,but to <br /> build it in the best way to address community interests. Councilmember Etten noted that <br /> sometimes that meant spending more, but sometimes less, and sometimes not having any <br /> dollar increase. <br /> Mr. Rapp summarized that as figuring out what we're trying to achieve and the level of <br /> service to provide. <br /> Councilmember McGehee seconded those comments, and chose to look at it from the de- <br /> velopment context. Councilmember McGehee opined that it was important for residents <br /> to maintain existing amenities through the City Council's maintenance of its tax base <br /> while not hurting existing residents and when considering development. She opined that <br /> we need to figure out why we wanted to do a development and get a community consen- <br /> sus of the goal to raise the City's tax base. As another example, if the decision is for a <br /> community center, Councilmember McGehee opined that this was a different process in <br /> which one should first go to the community to see what they wanted and how they pro- <br /> posed to get, thus establishing what the priorities were in the community being served by <br /> the City Council. At that point, Councilmember McGehee opined that the City Council <br /> could then come back to make things work within a framework of consultation, coopera- <br /> tion and collaboration within the community, which she saw as the HOW. Councilmem- <br /> ber McGehee stated that she strongly supported this type of process rather than the way <br />