My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0217
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0217
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2015 4:09:05 PM
Creation date
3/27/2015 4:07:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/17/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Meeting Retreat <br /> Tuesday, February 17, 2015 <br /> Page 5 <br /> the City regularly did things, taking ideas from a development and trying to implement <br /> them by forcing the ideas on a community that did not support them. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon opined that his interpretation of why customer intimacy is de- <br /> sired is that, at the end of the day, staff and the City Council is serving people in the pur- <br /> est sense of the form, not customers per se, but its residents. Since he viewed that job as <br /> serving individuals, Mr. Trudgeon opined that it only made sense to approach it that way; <br /> and form a selfish point of view, noted that it felt good to help people and solve prob- <br /> lems, not just meet goals. <br /> Finance Director Miller opined that he saw a difference between providing a high level of <br /> service to all customers, but as a reality check, staff and the City Council was also here to <br /> provide service to all customers, even those who never came forward. <br /> Mr. Rapp noted that staff had responded on the survey highest for customer intimacy and <br /> the next response being for all of the above. From hearing staff's opinions so far, Mr. <br /> Rapp suggested he was hearing questions about what staff should be doing; and while <br /> there were unique solutions for each person, it was typically hard for staff to discern val- <br /> ue propositions. Rather, Mr. Rapp opined that the reality of value propositions were usu- <br /> ally one primary and some modest set of standards for the other two. Mr. Rapp further <br /> opined that this was the importance of a value proposition exercise, for staff to hear the <br /> City Council say they supported the primary value proposition rather than expressing <br /> confusion about which was the most important. <br /> In other words, Mayor Roe stated that the City Council needed to own the value proposi- <br /> tion and not keep giving staff different directions. <br /> In hearing budget discussions before starting today, Mr. Rapp suggested the value propo- <br /> sitions should guide the City's budget as well. But in the long run, Mr. Rapp recognized <br /> that it cost money to tailor things in the long run, and while money can be reallocated to <br /> provide higher service levels in some areas, uniformly the entire budget may have to be <br /> notched up. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that there needed to be community buy-in as well; and as stated by <br /> Councilmember McGehee, there should be no disconnect between the desired customer <br /> intimacy model and having the community state they only wanted an operational budget; <br /> but to somehow find the best of both. <br /> To build on that, Councilmember McGehee opined that the transparency piece would be <br /> to provide citizens and the public with education, background and facts about each issue <br /> in order for them to help the City Council make the right choices to meet their expecta- <br /> tions. <br /> Mr. Rapp noted that, in a government model, that approach was more complicated and <br /> also took into account locations of various agency operations, languages spoken, special <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.