Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Meeting Retreat <br /> Tuesday, February 17, 2015 <br /> Page 8 <br /> into play in determining the reasons for doing things, and trying to tailor things in unique <br /> situations (e.g. plowing cul-de-sacs for Public Works) and how those areas may be tai- <br /> lored, even if costing more money, but in presenting a new plan to the City Council to <br /> address them. For Finance, Mr. Rapp suggested it may be in defining who its customers <br /> were (e.g. City Council and outside world) and how it can better support those customers <br /> through differently formatted reports, or how choices affected and made things better or <br /> achieved customer intimacy while not sacrificing transparency and accuracy; and then ar- <br /> ticulate those choices to the decision-makers to make policy. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte noted an example of Mr. Schwartz and his staff providing op- <br /> tions to the City Council last year to address the frozen pipe issue. <br /> When talking about focusing on one value proposition, Mayor Roe suggested that it ad- <br /> dressed the resource side as well; opining that if spending a lot of time and resources <br /> above the minimum in other areas, by using the value proposition model, it could free up <br /> resources for other areas; but it would take some analysis to figure out the benefit of do- <br /> ing so. <br /> From her personal background in research, Councilmember McGehee stated that if opera- <br /> tional expectations are strong and tight, an organization should be able to manage brain- <br /> storming at 30% of its time while meeting as a group to review policy ideas within that <br /> group and see the issues and ways to shift and change the culture. Councilmember <br /> McGehee opined that there were times when the organization had to be controlled, but <br /> the rest of the time, cross training should work. <br /> Mr. Rapp noted that, at the end of the day, the City appeared to still want to be operation- <br /> ally excellence (control), but also still wanted some customer intimacy, on opposite ends <br /> of the spectrum; and asked participants to define which way they wanted to move. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon sought to focus on challenges, acknowledging that a lot of what <br /> the organization did was silo-oriented, with departments containing experts in their vari- <br /> ous fields. However, Mr. Trudgeon noted that staff was finding that most solutions actu- <br /> ally reach across departments and are multi-level in nature, and needed tailoring for each <br /> of those specific issues. As an example, Mr. Trudgeon referenced the Karen refugee <br /> population and how several departments were working with them on landlord issues <br /> (School District, and Community Development and Police Departments, and the Housing <br /> & Redevelopment Authority) and breaking new ground to do it, with no standard operat- <br /> ing manual. However, Mr. Trudgeon noted that, while trying to break free of the silo ap- <br /> proach to problem solving, it was still necessary to have some hierarchy in place, without <br /> falling back on department-specific solutions, but seeking a collaborative approach with- <br /> in the hierarchy. Mr. Trudgeon opined that this was what he'd like to see and be used <br /> more broadly. <br /> Mr. Rapp acknowledged that a collaborative culture most strongly supported a customer <br /> intimacy approach, and while being more complicated to manage, it was inclusive and <br />