2015_0415_CCpacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ATTACHMENT B 2z G& G Management operates 12 Multifamily Residential Dwelling buildings. The company 28 applied for 12 licenses and all 12 buildings were inspected between October 6th and lOth, 2014. 29 On December 26, 2014, the Community Development Department sent the owner copies of 3o inspection reports and notices of license type. The inspection reports identified violations and 3� included an explanatory letter (Attachment A and A.1). All 12 buildings received a`D' type 32 license. 3s On January 9, 2015, a meeting was held at Roseville City Hall with: Ramesh Gupta and Nidhi 34 Joshi ( G& G Management LLC), Paul Bilotta (Community Development Director), Don 35 Munson (Codes Coordinator) and David Englund (Code Compliance Officer). Mr. Gupta 36 requested the meeting to discuss the Inspection Reports and the `D' type licenses assigned to the 37 buildings. The issues discussed during the meeting were the same issues listed in their appeal. 38 On February 9, 2015, the City Manager received one email containing multiple appeals of 39 licensing decisions regarding the 12 properties (Attachment B Submittal 1). G& G Management 4o LLC is requesting: 41 A re-evaluation of the 12 buildings be conducted and their License Types be adjusted. 42 If re-evaluation is not possible; postpone the 6 month license renewal and waive the 4s renewal license fee until January of 2016. 44 Attached to the email appeal were several other documents and photos (Submittals 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 45 7). There are 13 specific points listed in the appeal objecting to the initial inspection, including: 46 1. Disagree with inspection results: 4� Staff response: It is assumed the disagreement is with the `D' type licenses 48 assigned to the 12 buildings. License types are assigned based on the number of 4g violations observed (interior and exterior) during the inspection. This number is 5o then divided by the numbers of units actually inspected. The violations/unit are 5� then compared to the pre-set schedule, which determines the license type assigned. 52 All apartment buildings in Roseville were inspected to the same criteria and all 5a license types were calculated in the same way. Using the same methods and 54 criteria, there were 81-A, 28-B, 19-C and 30-D licenses issued. 55 2. List of duplicate violations recorded: 56 Staff response: Per inspection procedures, violations are aggregated at the unit 5� level, so multiple violations inside an individual unit are counted only once (for 5g example, if a unit is missing 2 smolce detectors, it is counted as one violation 5g against the unit). However, if the same violation occurs in multiple units, this so would be counted as 1 violation against each of the separate units. This gives clear 61 direction to the property manager for ordering repairs. These same procedures 62 were applied to all properties throughout Roseville. 6� 3. List of Violations which were corrected right away during inspection: 64 Staff response: Many observed and noted violations were corrected as the 65 individual inspections progressed. However, procedure is for all violations s6 observed during the inspection to be noted on the inspection report. It is not the 6� intent of the ardinance far city staff to enter buildings and identify routine 6s maintenance for the property manager. The intent of the ordinance is to ensure 69 property owners self-inspect and maintain their properties in good repair. As 1 Request for Board of Adjustments and Appeals Page 2 of 6