My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-03-03_PR Comm Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2015
>
2015-03-03_PR Comm Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2015 1:40:50 PM
Creation date
4/20/2015 1:38:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ftegular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 17, 2014 <br />Page 4 <br />Mayor Roe noted, from his discussions and outreach from neighboring mayors, <br />the need for joint efforts to address this regional problem, and apologized to those <br />mayors for not following tip on the issue.. Mayor Roe suggested that the Commis- <br />sion and/or staff look at the issue further, and suggested some of tic partnering <br />should involve Ramsey County as well. <br />Community Center <br />Chair Holt asked for City Council direction on whether or not to pursue this issue <br />in 2014/2015, as the Commission had kept it on the back burner for a long time, <br />even though it was part of discussions and the whole process during the Park Re- <br />newal Program and bonding consideration. Chair Holt advised that limited in- <br />formation was available, but sougbt direction from the City Council on whether <br />they wanted more information or updates on the existing information, or no action <br />at all by the Commission. <br />Councilmember McGehee stated that personally, she would say no, because the <br />opportunity was missed when the bonding and cannnunity survey went through; <br />with the result of six gathering spots or 'buildings, only supported by 6% of the <br />residents surveyed, with a considerable amount of public money already spent, <br />and the decision already made on *how it would be spent. Councilmember McGe- <br />hee stated that she favored a community center first, but the choice was not made <br />that way. <br />Chair Holt clarified that the Commission did not consider the gathering places to <br />serve the same purpose as a community center, with the public's vision consisting <br />of a much larger structure to serve multiple functions. <br />Councilmember McGehee opined that the public had not supported upgraded <br />buildings to replace wan-ning houses, and not six buildings supported by Only 6% <br />of the populace. Until she observed how the Parks Renewal Program buildings <br />were used and funded for maintenance, she was not interested in pursuing other <br />buildings. <br />Councilmember Laliberte opined that it was always good to collect updated in- <br />forrnation to assist in ongoing decision making over the short- and long-term, and <br />supported a limited amount of Commission time to be spent on the issue. Coun- <br />cilmember Laliberte spoke in support of updated information on the Shoreview <br />Community Center and recent improvernents they undertook and their justifica- <br />tion of those improvements and associated costs; improvernents on the New <br />Brighton Community Center, if any; and any recent information available from <br />the City of Maplewood's facility. Councilmember Lalibeite expressed tier inter- <br />est in observing how the new Park Renewal Program buildings would be utilized <br />over the next year, and therefore, thought the earliest need for updated infor- <br />mation by the City Council would be in 2016. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.