Laserfiche WebLink
34 Chair Stenlund expressed his personal thanks and gratitude for the services of <br />35 Commissioners Felice and Gjerdingen as they completed their terms on the <br />36 PWETC. Chair Stenlund noted their invaluable knowledge of the City's <br />37 pedestrian and bicycle trails in the community, as well as those segments still <br />38 needed. Chair Stenlund stated that he had been honored to serve with both <br />39 Commissioners; and encouraged them to be present at the April 6, 2015 City <br />40 Council meeting for a formal recognition of their service. <br />41 <br />42 Public Works Director Schwartz concurred, and included staff s appreciation of <br />43 Commissioners Felice and Gjerdingen. <br />44 <br />45 5. Communication Items <br />46 Mr. Schwartz and Mr. Culver each briefly reviewed project updates and <br />47 maintenance activities listed in the staff report and attachments dated March 24, <br />48 2015. <br />49 <br />50 Mr. Culver expanded on the comments regarding the City Council's rejection, at <br />51 staff s recommendation, of all bids recently received for the Evergreen <br />52 Stormwater Re -use Proje due to their wide variation in pricing and bids coming <br />53 in higher than the engin s estimate. Mr. Culver advised that staff had met with <br />54 the contractor, but with the uptick in the economic situation, contractor prices <br />55 were based on their increased business and private projects, with them no longer <br />56 being as needy for work. Mr. Culver noted that this system is relatively deep <br />57 compared to a typical system, and extra depth and complexity of the project <br />58 included the need to run it underneath the sanitary sewer line, increasing <br />59 unknowns for estimating by contractors, as well as their additional risk involved. <br />60 At the request of the PWETC, Mr. Culver advised that, while staff was still <br />61 reviewing the situation, it may to determined that it would not be prudent to rebid <br />62 the project later in the year, given the proximity to the ballfield and the actual <br />63 scope of a project that would not negatively impact the construction work planned <br />64 4there; and while it may be possible, it would be challenging to find a design that <br />65 could work. Under the circumstanced, Mr. Culver noted that the City would most <br />66 likely Le returning the $300,000 grant awarded for the project. <br />67 <br />68 Further discussion included a report by staff that spring street sweeping had been <br />69 done in approximately half of the City; a review of types of curbs and annual <br />70 replacement as able and as funds allow; staff changes within the Public <br />71 Works Depart* with City Council approval of organizational changes related <br />72 to building maintenance management by a private firm on a one-year trial basis, <br />73 allowing for creation of an Office Assistant position for entry-level clerical duties; <br />74 and upcoming retirements of the Utility Working Foreman, as well as the <br />75 retirement of Public Works Director Schwartz at the end of April. <br />76 <br />77 6. Leaf Pickup Program Discussion <br />78 Mr. Schwartz provided a presentation on the current program and anticipated cost <br />79 impacts for equipment replacement in the next budget cycle. Mr. Schwartz <br />Page 2 of 17 <br />