Laserfiche WebLink
Xri <br />127 Member Lenz opined the way the program was promoted did not serve to <br />128 encourage interest its use, and suggested better promotion of the program if it was <br />129 to continue. <br />130 <br />131 Member Cihacek questioned if better promotion would bring numbers up <br />132 sufficiently to make the program viable; stating that he personally transported his <br />133 leaves to the compost site and then returned in the spring to pick up compost, <br />134 noting that he found that of value as well. <br />135 AL <br />136 Member Lenz suggested promotion of both the leaf pickup program and <br />137 availability of compost for residents to help the environment either way. <br />138 <br />139 Mr. Schwartz briefly reviewed anticipated replacement equipment needs in 2015 <br />140 and 2016 at a total of $350,000 specific to the leaf program itself, and not <br />141 including extraneous equipment such as dump trucks and equipment used for <br />142 other applications as well. Mr. Schwartz advised that, the reason staff was <br />143 seeking input from the PWETC was due to the current equipment being at the end <br />144 of its useful life, leaving alternative but to replace it if the program was to <br />145 continue. <br />146 <br />147 Specific to labor for the lea ogram alone Mr. Schwartz advised that in 2014 <br />148 the City documented 1,026 crew hours for this program. Other Street Division <br />149 activities at that time of year (e.g. tree trimming, tree storm damage removal, sign <br />150 maintenance, patching, sweeping and other preventative maintenance) are put on <br />151 hold. <br />152 4 <br />153 At the request of Member Cihacek, Mr. Schwartz confirmed that hours currently <br />154 used for the leaf pickup program could be allocated to those other areas. Mr. <br />155 Schwartz nothat, if trees were not sistently and properly trimmed, it <br />156 created additional maintenance costs to the City when additional tree damage <br />157 occurs during storms. <br />158 <br />159 At the request of Member Seigler, Mr. Schwartz advised that more users didn't <br />160 necessarily can a direct incremental cost to the City as the current smaller <br />161 number of p 'ci ants required more travel time between stops for the crew. <br />162 <br />163 While recognizi that promotion often impacted participation, in this case <br />164 Member Wozniak opined that it wouldn't be highly evident. Personally, Member <br />165 Wozniak opined that, while a nice service, the program was not worth the money <br />166 required; and without a large population turnover in the community that might <br />167 increase participation or indicate a newer demographic not aware of or alert to the <br />168 program, he could see no major increases in the program through additional or <br />169 more enticing promotion of it. <br />170 <br />Page 4 of 17 <br />