Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,April 6,2015 <br /> Page 7 <br /> City Attorney Gaughan stated that he anticipated and it would be appropriate for any de- <br /> cision of the Board to be memorialized in a resolution, showing the specific findings of <br /> fact supporting that decision; with the City Attorney's office and staff preparing a draft <br /> resolution for action by the Board at a future meeting on the Consent Agenda for formal <br /> adoption. Mr. Gaughan recommended this process as the appropriate course of action for <br /> the Board, at which time the ordinance would then be delivered to the property owner. <br /> City Attorney Gaughan reviewed the proscribed protocol for tonight's Board of Adjust- <br /> ments and Appeals to begin with a staff summary presentation of their actions for the <br /> Board, followed by the property owner's appeal rationale for appealing this administra- <br /> tive action; at which time the Board could move a resolution denying or affirming the ap- <br /> peal, and orally state their findings of fact supporting that decision, at which time the res- <br /> olution would be formally prepared for subsequent review and ratification by the body. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, City Attorney Gaughan confirmed that the City Council <br /> should recess and convene as the Board. <br /> Laliberte moved, Etten seconded, recessing the City Council meeting at approximately <br /> 7:02 p.m. and convening as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, McGehee, and Roe <br /> Nays: None. <br /> Board of Adjustments and Appeals for the City of Roseville <br /> Chair Roe reiterated the procedure as noted by City Attorney Gaughan in considering the <br /> appeal of administrative action as submitted by G & G Management, owner of twelve <br /> multi-family residential rental properties in Roseville. <br /> Roseville City staff was represented by Codes Coordinator Don Munson and Code <br /> Compliance Officer/Inspector David England. <br /> As detailed in the Request for Council Action (RCA) dated April 6, 2015, Mr. Munson <br /> advised that the rental inspections for all twelve buildings had been performed between <br /> October 6 and 10, 2014. Mr. Munson noted that all 158 multi-family apartment buildings <br /> in Roseville had been inspected in the same manner and using the same criteria. Of those <br /> 158 buildings, Mr. Munson reported that thirty had been issued "D" licenses and advised <br /> of the appeal process of that determination, with this appeal the only one received to-date. <br /> At the request of Board Member Willmus, Mr. Munson confirmed that all twelve build- <br /> ings had received "D" due to multiple violations; and reported on various meetings held <br /> to-date between staff and G & G Management. Mr. Munson noted that this appeal dis- <br /> puted thirteen points, eight main ones, based on staffs license calculations; and provided <br /> staffs responses to those points as detailed in the RCA and in response to the G & G <br /> Management letter(Attachment B submittals). <br />