My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0406
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 2:55:39 PM
Creation date
5/4/2015 1:24:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/6/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,April 6, 2015 <br /> Page 8 <br /> At the request of Board Member McGehee, Mr. Munson clarified that schedule for the <br /> first cycle of inspections conducted in October, with the next cycle scheduled for May, <br /> accomplishing a six month time period as proscribed by City Code. <br /> Board Member Laliberte noted the revisions recently made to the Renal Licensing Ordi- <br /> nance to address outdoor issues and scheduling their compliance based on weather and <br /> timing. <br /> Mr. Munson advised that revisions to the ordinance provided that those issues are ad- <br /> dressed through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the property owner <br /> and City staff, and would be taken into consideration in all inspection and/or renewal cy- <br /> cles. Specifically related to the G & G Management properties, Mr. Munson advised that <br /> if the property owner agrees, through an MOU, to correct those outside and/or long-term <br /> weather-related issues and agrees to repair those items on a set schedule that if agreeable <br /> to the City, those items would then be removed from the next inspection as far as them <br /> being calculated in the next inspection renewal cycle. Mr. Munson noted that this could <br /> provide a better chance for them to receive a grade on their properties by ensuring their <br /> compliance, particularly for those more expensive, long-term or outside items, as mutual- <br /> ly agreed to. <br /> Board Member McGehee noted a question she'd received from a resident regarding the <br /> property behind and lack of clarity as to whether the City had right-of-way and if so, how <br /> staff made a delineation on property lines and areas of responsibility. <br /> Mr. Munson clarified that there was a dirt pathway behind the Dairy Queen where litter <br /> blows between properties, with the same issues found every spring after the snow melts. <br /> Mr. Munson advised that staff had repeatedly contacted both the adjacent shopping center <br /> and G & G Management after snowfall to clean- up that area, and both parties had always <br /> been responsive to that request. Mr. Munson confirmed that a similar letter was currently <br /> being prepared for distribution by staff for mailing later this week. However, Mr. Mun- <br /> son further clarified that the rental license inspection report stated that there was a lot of <br /> litter on the G & G Management site, also a separate issue they had been asked to address <br /> repeatedly for a number of years, and directly attributable to their site with that litter <br /> blowing into the wooded area. <br /> Mr. Munson advised that, while the City may have an easement in that area, the litter is- <br /> sue blowing into the woods were owned by the shopping center and G & G. <br /> Chair Roe noted that the litter in that area was attributable to the G & G site itself, and the <br /> litter and debris on the path may or may not be relevant to the license type determination <br /> only to the extent it was considered a violation at the original inspection. <br /> Mayor Roe sought further clarification on the role of the Board from City Attorney <br /> Gaughan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.