My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_0413
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_0413
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2015 2:58:40 PM
Creation date
5/4/2015 1:53:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/13/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,April 13, 2015 <br /> Page 6 <br /> residents not to feed deer corn, deer were just as happy with bird seed, but that <br /> was not discouraged. <br /> In his personal review of the City of Shoreview ordinance offered as a model or- <br /> dinance for Roseville to consider, Mr. Callaghan expressed his shock that no one <br /> had yet taken that to court, as he observed many legal issues with it and suggested <br /> a careful review of that language by the City Attorney. As examples, Mr. Calla- <br /> ghan noted there was no definition of wild animals, where bow hunters can hunt <br /> deer and how to protect private property and trespass concerns. <br /> Even though the City may discourage feeding deer, Mr. Callaghan opined that the <br /> City was not good at enforcing its ordinances or appeared to him to be very selec- <br /> tive about who received enforcement. Mr. Callaghan opined that the Community <br /> Development Department appeared to already be overworked and couldn't handle <br /> enforcement of its current ordinance due to s shortage of personnel, and ques- <br /> tioned how they could enforce additional ordinance. <br /> Mr. Callaghan stated that he would not recommend this ordinance. <br /> Since the City Council made a decision last year that someone didn't have to fol- <br /> low a current ordinance because they were grandfathered in, Mr. Callaghan sug- <br /> gested that everyone in Roseville should be considered grandfathered in to this <br /> particular ordinance and not need to comply if that rationale was to be consistent. <br /> If there was a distinction, Mr. Callaghan suggested the City provide a distinction <br /> if there was one since that City Council decision of a year ago. <br /> Bill Frank,3141 Sandyhook Drive <br /> Mr. Frank stated that they had deer going through their yard on an almost daily <br /> basis, a herd of approximately five deer. As fifteen year residents, Mr. Frank not- <br /> ed that this was not the case during the first ten years, but all of a sudden in the <br /> last five years, there was a regular path for the deer. <br /> Mr. Frank expressed concern for a new family with a two and four year old child <br /> having recently moved into their cul-de-sac, who when playing outdoors would be <br /> no match for large deer, and who could potentially be in real danger and without <br /> protection from the deer. While not considering deer wild animals and not antici- <br /> pating that they would hurt anyone, Mr. Frank noted how tame the deer appeared <br /> to be to people in their neighborhood, showing little if any fear. <br /> Peter Rhode,3161 Sandyhook Drive <br /> Mr. Rhodes agreed with the previous speaker's comments about the rarity of see- <br /> ing deer in the past compared to his observation of groups of them from 5 — 13 in <br /> the park across the way, and observing a group of five crossing Owasso Boule- <br /> vard just this afternoon. Mr. Rhode supported the position provided by Mr. Too- <br /> good for getting an ordinance in place to provide management in the future. Mr. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.