My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_0511_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_0511_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2015 2:33:31 PM
Creation date
5/7/2015 1:57:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 6, 2015 <br />Page 8 of 1 1 <br />MPCA Comment: Without knowing the site elevation, it is hard to determine what the groundwater <br />depth is from grade. Given that there are wetlands located less than 150 feet from the site, it could <br />be reasonable to assume groundwater is quite shallow. During construction, dewatering may be <br />required. It may be necessary to obtain a Minnesota Department of Natural Resources water <br />appropriation permit for this activity. Additionally, depending on the method for disposal of the water <br />from the dewatering activity, it may be necessary to obtain an MPCA NPDES/SDS waste water permit <br />if discharge is to a water body, wetland, or land surface. <br />ROSEVILLE's Comment: As above. <br />RAMAKER Comment: If dewatering was to be required during the construction stage of the project, <br />all dewatering will follow the guidances outlined in the forthcoming Waste Handling Plan (see 13 <br />A. & B., below). The Waste Handling Plan will provide a summary on when dewatering will <br />occur and how the water is to be treated (stormwater sewer, sfanitary sewer, or bulk storage for <br />off-site disposal, etc.). Further details will follow, and will be made available prior to fihe inifiiation <br />of consfrucfion. <br />12BI. & BIII. WATER RESOURCES <br />MPCA Comment: The stormwater management plan should be summarized here to reflect the information <br />requested in these sections. <br />ROSEVILLE's Comment: State see above and note section where you discussed storm water plan. <br />RAMAKER Comment: See below: <br />1 2Bi - Storm water: <br />Describe the quantity and quality of storm water runoff at the site prior to post construction. Include <br />the routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site (major downstream water bodies as well <br />as the immediate receiving waters). <br />See Section 4.1 and 4.2 of the Storm Water Management Plan, prepared by RAMAKER and <br />dated February 13, 2015. <br />Discuss any environmental effects from storm water discharges. Describe storm water pollution <br />prevention plans including temporary and permanent runoff controls and potential Besf management <br />Practice {BMP) site locations to manage or freat storm water runoff. Identify specific erosion control, <br />sedimentation control or stabilization measures to address soil limitations during and after project <br />construction. <br />See forthcoming Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan to be completed by RAMAKER. <br />Specifics regarding these criferia will be outlined throughout fihe report. Please contact Jesse <br />Mesner of Cities Edge Architecfis fio schedule a pre-consfruction review of the plan. <br />1 2Biii - Surface Waters: <br />a) Wetlands: Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to wetland features such as <br />draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging and vegetative removal. Discuss direct and indirect <br />environmental effects from physical modification of wetlands, including the anticipated effects that <br />any proposed wetland alferations may have to the host watershed. Identify measures to avoid {e.g., <br />available alternatives that were considered), minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to wetlands. <br />Discuss whether any required compensatory wetland mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts will <br />occur in the same minor or major watershed, and identify those probable locations. <br />The project will be provided wifh a detention area thafi will control the rate of runoff as well <br />as provide some degree of wafier treatment and oil removal. Runoff discharge will be <br />connected to the existing ROSEVILLE sform wafier sewer system and pre and posf-development <br />runoff rates will remain unchanged or reduced. Therefore, effects to existing nearby wetlands <br />are not expected. Storm water will be diverted to ROSEVILLE's existing storm sewer system. <br />As such, there will be no net increase and/or Direct/Indirect effect to wetlands. <br />b) Other surface waters: Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to surface water <br />features {lakes, streams, ponds, intermittent channels, county �judicial ditches) such as draining, <br />filling, permanent inundation, dredging, diking, stream diversion, impoundment, aquatic plant <br />removal and riparian alteration. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical <br />modification of water features. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental <br />effects to surface water features, including in-water Best Management Practices that are proposed to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.