2015_0511_CCPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

May 6, 2015 Page 10 of 1 1 13C. & D. CONTAMINATION/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTES MPCA Comment: Although the Project (either during construction or operation) will likely not generate significant amounts of hazardous wastes, there is a potential for environmental effects from an accidental spill or release of hazardous materials during construction. It should be determined whether there will be any petroleum storage on-site for refueling construction equipment. If so, it should be documented how this storage will be contained, and what the response would be in the event of a release of petroleum products. ROSEVILLE's Comment: Provide a brief response on how the site plans to address petro refuling and protect�contain possible spill. RAMAKER Comment: The specifications for this project will outline that the General Contractor will be required to establish a hazardous material handling and containment plan that must be followed during the construction phase of this project. This plan will outline specific requirements such as secondary containmenfi systems for on-site sforage of fuel or other potentially hazardous maferials. The plan will further define specific procedures in the event of an inadvertent release. Air quality and dust control methods will also be part of this established plan, and will include such things as watering roadways to control dust, or proper PPE to be used around equipment to maintain worker safety. 14B. AIR MPCA Comment: There will be an increase in vehicular emissions, particularly from equipment during construction of the hotels. The information requested in this section should be included here. ROSEVILLE's Comment: If known please indicate the anticipated amount of vehicle emissions released form construction vehicles during constriction. RAMAKER Comment: During the start of consfiruction, heavy excavafiing equipment will be necessary that has the potenfial to add minimally fio air emissions. The General Confractor has been made aware that construction activities are required to meet all applicable EPA requirements as they pertain to specific construction operations. As far as permanent building emissions, current codes and MEP design standards provide that when properly installed, little or no emissions are developed or emitted from the structure. 14C. DUST AND ODORS MPCA Comment: There will be a significant increase in dust during construction of this Project. The measures to be used to minimize or mitigate the effects of dust both from the site and from soil transported from the site to the streets from construction traffic should be discussed in this section. ROSEVILLE's Comment: Provide brief response indication how you plan to minimize�mitigate dust form construction site. RAMAKER Comment: The contractors will be made aware of the need to regularly spray water throughout the site so as to keep bare soil areas moist, thus limiting the potential of airborn dust. 15. NOISE MPCA Comment: Noise levels will increase with construction equipment use. The Project should conform to any local noise ordinances. This should be addressed in this section. ROSEVILLE's Comment: Provide a note that you are aware of ROSEVILLE noise standards. RAMAKER Comment: RAMAKER has validated that the owner is aware of ROSEVILLE's noise standards. 16. TRANSPORTATION MPCA Comment: The traffic study was not included as part of the MPCA's review of the draft ROSEVILLE Environmental Review Worksheet. The traffic study should be summarized and included in these sections. ROSEVILLE's Comment: Response to this item is not required. RAMAKER Comment: Response to this item has not been provided. 18. CUMULATIVE POTENTIAL EFFECTS MPCA Comment: If contaminated soil is encountered at the site, excavating and hauling this hazardous material has the potential to combine with fugitive dust emissions, and should be discussed in this section.