Laserfiche WebLink
36The scope of services describe the primary services for support of the HRA as follows: <br />37Day-to-day HRA support functions <br />38Financial services <br />39Neighborhood Enhancement Program/Business Enhancement Program (NEP/BEP) <br />40 <br />41The fee that is illustrated includes the amounts previously agreed to regarding financial services, <br />42the budgeted amount for NEP/BEP and the previously proposed amounts for staffing which is <br />43based on a formula equal to 100% of the Executive Director’s salary and benefits as well as 50% <br />44of the Community Development Department’s Senior Office Assistant’s salary and benefits. <br />45The Executive Director/Senior Office Assistant formula just assumes salary and benefits and <br />46does not attempt to capture many other forms of common overhead necessary for an employee to <br />47function including workspace, supplies and equipment, etc. <br />48 <br />49It should be noted that the funding formulas are simply negotiated agreements between the two <br />50bodies as to a way to determine a mutually agreed upon reasonable contribution and do not mean <br />51that the HRA is limited to just using those two members of the City staff, nor does it mean that <br />52these two members of the City staff must split their time between City and HRA work in those <br />53exact same proportions. It is just a mutually agreed upon formula for determining a budget <br />54amount for each body. It is very common for the HRA to receive support from additional <br />55personnel including Code Enforcement, Public Works, Planning, GIS, City Manager’s office, <br />56Parks, Police, Finance and Fire as needed. <br />57 <br />58It is anticipated that minor adjustments to the scope of services would be able to be managed <br />59without a need to revisit the contract to avoid excessive reapprovals. However, major program <br />60additions or deletions would likely require that the services contract be revised so that both <br />61bodies could adjust their budget, staffing and/or work plan assumptions. <br />62 <br />63It should be noted that Exhibits A and B reference that the scope of services and fee payments <br />64are for the entire calendar year of 2015 in order to prevent any confusion caused by the late <br />65contract approval. At this time, all quarterly transfers from the HRA to the City have been held, <br />66pending the approval of a contract (i.e. the City of Roseville has been covering service costs). <br />67Also, a second motion is suggested to begin the termination process with the City of Roseville <br />68for the Fiscal Assistance Contract since the scope will be contained in the recommended <br />69contract. Staff will monitor the 2015 transfers to ensure the HRA is not overcharged for Fiscal <br />70Assistance. <br />71 <br />Suggested HRA Action <br />722.0 <br />By motion <br />731., approve service contract with the City of Roseville for $203,670 for calendar <br />74year 2015. <br />75 <br />By motion <br />762., direct staff to notify the City that the HRA is providing a 30 day notice that it <br />77intends to terminate the previously approved Fiscal Assistance Contract. <br />78 <br />79 <br />Prepared by: Paul Bilotta, Community Development Director (651-792-7071) <br />80 <br />Attachments: A: Services Agreement <br />RHRA Services Contracts (05-19-15) - Page 2 of 2 <br /> <br />