CC_Minutes_2015_0504 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, May 4, 2015 Page 14 port for not splitting that section, but leaving it all in Subarea A for lower intensi- ty uses, and more heavy intensity to the south. At the request of Mayor Roe for clarification, Councilmember Etten suggested leaving all parcels currently identified in the northwest corner in Subarea A and not split it up given the lake storm water pond and other things, making sense to leave it as a whole parcel and avoid running into other multi-family residential parcels. Councilmember Laliberte agreed, opining that if intended for a less intensive use, she saw no reason to carve up that area. General Groupings (Attachment B, continued) Mayor Roe noted significant differences between Subareas B and C, noting two distinct City Council viewpoints expressed tonight regarding intended uses or lo- cations, particularly in Subarea C, the central area around Fairview Avenue. Specific to Subarea C, Councilmember McGehee noted that it was a huge area, including up to County Road C, and she saw a slight difference in Subarea C south of Terrace Drive versus those areas along County Road C and Fairview Av- enue, at least east of Fairview Avenue (former Subarea 5). For clarification at the request of Mayor Roe, Councilmember McGehee stated that she was fine with including former Subarea 5 in Subarea B all the way up to Terrace Drive. Mayor Roe stated that he still lumped those Subareas together as a zoning area, while recognizing the City Council's approach to former Subarea 6 may suggest more of a rehabilitation versus redevelopment process. At the request of Mayor Roe, Councilmember Etten concurred that the former Subarea 6, now Subarea C, should not be split up since it has some flexibility and Subarea C fit close enough. Councilmember Etten suggested leaving that area whole, especially with the current businesses there being successful and not desir- ing to zone them out of that area. Mayor Roe noted there were three basic subareas moving forward and creating a target depending on how they were defined. Councilmember Laliberte sought clarification as to whether the body saw Subare- as C uses being treated differently than the two Subarea B's. Councilmembers McGehee and Etten agreed they would consider treating them differently.